The Mexico City Initiative at MIT, led by the Institute’s Norman B. Leventhal Center for Advanced Urbanism (LCAU), has conceived and modeled an impressive array of solutions for challenges facing urban areas in Mexico and beyond. Faculty and students have designed the repurposing of a vintage roller coaster as a public meeting space, modeled strategies to decarbonize a municipal neighborhood, and proposed plans to convert nearly 990 acres of what was once Latin America’s largest landfill into a model of ecological restoration and clean energy production. The initiative has also spawned a sustainable construction startup that’s contributing to local economies in both Mexico and the United States.

When asked what’s most impactful about their work, however, those leading and collaborating with the LCAU’s Mexico City Initiative point to something else: the cross-border human connections they say are essential to continuing the ideation, development, and implementation of projects designed for Mexico City, but likely to be scalable and beneficial in urban centers around the world.

“To really create change in cities, we need to build relationships, friendships, and new networks. And through building them together, we can go so much further,” says Sarah Williams, director of the LCAU, which leads the initiative in collaboration with the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), the Mexico City government, and the engineering firm Mota-Engil Mexico.

“I think one of the big things we’re proud of is there have been a lot of personal connections created between MIT and UNAM, and I think research collaboration will result from these connections,” says Onésimo Flores PhD ’13, director general of Mota-Engil Mexico’s transportation mobility division. “I think what we have contributed to building is deepening collaboration.”   

UNAM associate professor of architecture Elena Tudela agrees, noting that “beyond the projects themselves, we have developed a genuine friendship that I hope will continue long after this specific collaboration ends.”

“What I personally value most from these years of collaboration on Mexico City’s energy transition is the set of relationships we have built — with researchers, professors and especially the team at the LCAU,” says Tudela, an initiative collaborator. “For local students, the impact has been even more profound. It built bonds that transcend the workshop’s objectives, contributing to a deeper understanding of design as a collaborative, multidisciplinary practice.”

Williams credits Flores with helping to obtain Mota-Engil’s crucial financial support for the LCAU’s Mexico City Initiative. An MIT alumnus who earned his PhD in urban studies and planning in 2013 with Mota-Engil scholarship aid, Flores says the company’s support is meant to accomplish three goals: connect Mexican researchers with MIT, get Mexican students involved in MIT programs, and stimulate interest in projects relevant to cities like Mexico City among MIT faculty.   

“If you can find urban solutions for a city as complex as Mexico City, you can probably figure it out for any city in the world, particularly in the Global South,” he says.

Over the past three years, faculty and students from MIT and UNAM have worked on projects centered on energy transition. Project teams, collaborators, interested local officials, business leaders, and others gathered for a recent symposium showcasing the progress made on the Mexico City Initiative’s projects so far.

Held in Mexico City last fall and featuring presentations by several MIT faculty, the “Energy Transitions” symposium was hosted by the LCAU, UNAM, and Mota-Engil Mexico. Its purpose “was to make sure the research effort that was done together was presented to the public and private sectors — groups that might be able to take the research to the next level,” says Williams, an MIT associate professor of technology and urban planning.

“The lecture series was exciting because we saw an interest in extending all the projects. I also think the conversations and ideas that were had in the room spark the kind of civic debate needed to transform our cities,” Williams says.

Established in 2013, the LCAU’s work cuts across diverse research fields to create innovation in cities.

“There’s not one field that can transform our future cities — innovation happens when we cross disciplines,” says Williams, who became LCAU director four years ago and has since focused the center’s mission on building and maintaining long-term relationships with cities through “City Initiatives.”

Other City Initiatives have included collaborations in Boston, as well as Sydney, Australia; Beirut, Lebanon; Bogota, Colombia; and Pristina, Kosovo. Mexico City was among the first initiatives and is the LCAU’s longest-standing program. Activities have included several classes held between MIT and Mexico City, a public exhibition, a hackathon with MITdesignX, and numerous joint research projects.

Williams describes it as “a fantastic relationship,” which began with development of a strategic plan for a Mexico City Innovation Lab, leading to a decision to focus the initiative on themes playing out over the course of about two years. The current theme is Energy Intersections, which looks at the role design plays in transitioning to cleaner energy infrastructure. 

“This came from the group seeing that Mexico wanted to be a player in the global manufacturing marketplace and one of the barriers was how heavily polluted their energy infrastructure was,” Willliams says.

“The LCAU was founded for this idea that the work and research that we do about cities should be experimental, but also framed within contemporary policies and politics,” she says, adding that the team had considered other possible themes — from water and emergency planning to housing — but “as we started to think about energy, it just became so clearly important.”

Attracting about 70 attendees from Mexico City’s academic, government, and private sectors, the symposium was convened to enable MIT and UNAM researchers to share findings and discuss paths forward for several projects. Featured projects included:

• Redesigning Vallejo-I — aimed at transforming Mexico City’s Vallejo Industrial Zone into a revitalized hub for industry, transportation and housing;
• Decarbonize and Revitalize: Urban Regeneration for Mexico City’s Neighborhoods — which envisions ways for energy, equity, and design to regenerate Mexico City neighborhoods, using the Daniel Garza neighborhood as a model; and
• Bordo Poniente: Territories of Industrial and Ecological Metabolism — which presents strategies for reinventing what was once the world’s third-largest solid waste landfill (Bordo Poniente).

Leading the Bordo Poniente panel was project leader Eran Ben-Joseph, professor of landscape architecture and urban planning at MIT. Developed with UNAM and Mota-Engil partners, the project involved 12 MIT School of Architecture and Planning graduate students working across disciplines to address four integrated objectives: converting waste into public value, advancing energy transition (through methane/leachate capture), promoting equity and environmental justice for neighboring communities, and generating actionable policy recommendations, Ben-Joseph says.

“This collaborative effort exemplifies how international courses can combine rigorous fieldwork, interdisciplinary expertise, and community engagement to reimagine a toxic site as a model of urban regeneration and ecological repair,” he says, adding that the project “reflects MIT’s commitments to climate action, urban innovation, and applied systems thinking.” With over 100,000 landfills worldwide, he says, “a replicable ‘Bordo Model’ positions MIT as a global leader in transformation of waste landscapes into energy, ecological, and civic assets.”

In a similar vein, the Vallejo project reimagines urban industrial blocks as engines of clean energy generation, water resilience, and sustainable mobility. Led by MIT Department of Architecture Lecturer Roi Salgueiro Barrio and moderated by UNAM associate professor of architecture and project collaborator Daniel Daou, the symposium’s Redesigning Vallejo panel discussed how the project establishes an actionable framework for energy and industrial transition that can inspire and guide the revival of other industrial areas.

Finally, MIT professor of architecture and urbanism and project leader Rafi Segal presented the team’s Daniel Garza neighborhood case study, which highlighted two replicable urban planning and community clean energy project designs resulting from work by MIT and UNAM researchers.

“The most impactful aspect of ‘Decarbonize and Revitalize’ is its ability to merge energy transition with urban regeneration at the neighborhood scale. The project does not fit neatly into a single disciplinary category; it operates at the intersection of energy, design, and social infrastructure,” says Daniela Martinez Chapa, a former MIT student and an architect and urban designer who served as research assistant on the MIT team. “The project exemplifies MIT’s commitment to collaborative, context-specific innovation,” she adds.

Like others involved with the Mexico City Initiative, UNAM’s Tudela pointed out how working across disciplines, institutions, and borders has benefited both UNAM and MIT.

“MIT brings cutting-edge tools and methodologies in fields such as energy and urban data science, while UNAM contributes deep local expertise, strong social perspectives, and long-standing engagement with communities,” Tudela says. “This combination has produced highly creative, context-sensitive outcomes.”

As for next steps, Williams is hopeful that conversations started at this fall’s symposium might push the team’s research into the local limelight, helping them go from research and strategies to on-the-ground reality. She pointed to the success of an earlier LCAU Mexico City project as an example of what can happen when the right ideas and stakeholders coalesce.

For the 2022 Mextropoli Architecture and City Festival in Mexico City, an MIT team presented “Sueños con Fiber/Timber, Earth/Concrete.”

“As part of that project, we took a decommissioned roller coaster and reused it as a public forum space. And so that was talking about reuse of wood and making sure that building materials are reused in unique ways,” Williams says.

Adjacent to the repurposed roller coaster, Caitlin Mueller, an associate professor in MIT’s departments of Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering, built a structure made of 3D printed bricks that capture the traditional style of Mexican construction, but with a fraction of the carbon footprint. Mueller has since taken the Sueños project further, co-founding a design and technology company (Forma Systems) focused on expanding access to high-quality, low-carbon affordable housing and building systems by reimagining widely available materials such as concrete and earth.

“Caitlin’s project with the bricks is just such a good example of what the Cities Initiative can do. We seeded collaborative research, and now there’s a startup based off the idea, and they are continuing to do the work,” Williams says. “I think that’s the idea — we help to fund research that combines deep local knowledge and MIT’s innovation environment to help inspire new ideas and technologies for cities.

“I would hope these new projects just presented in Mexico would have a similar trajectory,” she says. “The future is open.”

Michael J. Moody, who has served as Institute auditor since 2014, will retire from MIT in October, following a career in internal and external audit spanning 40 years.

Executive Vice President and Treasurer Glen Shor announced the news today in a letter to MIT’s Academic Council.

“I have greatly appreciated Mike’s rigorous and collaborative approach to auditing and advising on the Institute’s policies and processes,” Shor wrote. “He has helped MIT accomplish far-reaching ambitions while adhering to best practices in administering programs and services.”

As Institute auditor, Moody oversees a division that conducts financial, operational, compliance, and technology reviews across MIT. He leads a team of internal auditors that serve as trusted advisors to administrative leadership and members of the MIT Corporation, assessing processes and making recommendations to control risks, improve processes, and enhance decision-making.

The MIT Audit Division maintains a dual reporting structure to ensure its independence. Moody and his team work for the MIT Corporation Risk and Audit Committee but receive administrative support from the MIT Office of the Executive Vice President and Treasurer.

“Mike is highly principled and rigorous with detail, earning our committee’s trust,” says Pat Callahan, chair of the Risk and Audit Committee. “The committee runs like clockwork because of Mike’s dedication and skill.”

Moody has guided the Audit Division through a transformative period, spearheading several impactful initiatives throughout his tenure. He advanced the approval of the first-ever Audit Division Charter to codify the unit’s independence and objectivity and to articulate its mandates for accountability and oversight, and he implemented a new process to distribute audit reports to all senior administrative officers as a best practice. He also initiated the Institute’s inaugural external quality assurance review, for which MIT received the highest rating. Moody has continued the practice of externally auditing the division.

Having a particular interest in leveraging analytics and data to improve workflows and inform assessments, Moody added a data analyst to his team in 2016. The team also sponsors the cross-Institute Data Analysts and Data Scientists (DADS) group, which seeks to foster collaboration while advancing analytics and data practices at an Institute level.

More recently, Moody helped establish the MIT AI Cohort to advance artificial intelligence solutions across the Institute while minimizing associated risks. The group, launched in November 2025, includes representatives from MIT Sloan School of Management, the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, the School of Engineering, MIT Libraries, the Office of the Vice President for Research, the Division of Graduate and Undergraduate Education, and MIT Health, among others.

A key aspect of Moody's work — and one that has been especially meaningful to him — is helping the MIT community understand the Audit Division's mission and role in furthering the Institute’s positive impact. To facilitate this, he instilled in his team a set of core values that emphasizes professionalism, objectivity, pragmatism, openness, and willingness to listen, and has presented it as a model for peer institutions. He has in this vein focused on building relationships with the community to identify the right opportunities for improvement in MIT’s operations and ensure that the Audit Division’s feedback is constructively delivered and received.

“Mike has been an invaluable partner,” says Suzy Nelson, MIT vice chancellor for student life. “Over the years, his collaborative and knowledgeable approach has helped us improve so many areas — from student organization event management to our business practices to enhancing our student support services. Mike has listened carefully to students’ needs and offered guidance aligned with the goals of the program and student safety.”

Before joining MIT, Moody served in audit and compliance roles at Northwestern University, the University of Illinois at Chicago, and the state of Illinois. At the public accounting firm Coopers and Lybrand (now Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP), he managed and performed information technology audits and served as a financial and technology consultant for clients in a variety of industries. Moody has also held numerous volunteer and elected leadership positions in international, national, and local professional audit associations. He holds certified internal auditor and certified information systems auditor designations, along with a certification in risk management assurance.

“In reflecting on my time here, I’m most proud of assembling a team that has made positive changes to how MIT operates,” says Moody. “It’s been very rewarding having leaders, staff, and researchers reach out for advice and assistance. It's a testament to the strong relationships we've built across the Institute.”

Shor and Callahan will soon formally launch a search for Institute auditor, and expect to identify Moody’s successor during the fall 2026 semester.

One of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease is the clumping of proteins called Tau, which form tangled fibrils in the brain. The more severe the clumping, the more advanced the disease is.

The Tau protein, which has also been linked to many other neurodegenerative diseases, is unstructured in its normal state, but in the pathological state it consists of a well-ordered rigid core surrounded by floppy segments. These disordered segments form a “fuzzy coat” that helps determine how Tau interacts with other molecules.

MIT chemists have now shown, for the first time, they can use nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to decipher the structure of this fuzzy coat. They hope their findings will aid efforts to develop drugs that interfere with Tau buildup in the brain.

“If you want to disaggregate these Tau fibrils with small-molecule drugs, then these drugs have to penetrate this fuzzy coat,” says Mei Hong, an MIT professor of chemistry and the senior author of the new study. “That would be an important future endeavor.”

MIT graduate student Jia Yi Zhang is the lead author of the paper, which appears today in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Former MIT postdoc Aurelio Dregni is also an author of the paper.

Analyzing the fuzzy coat

In a healthy brain, Tau proteins help to stabilize microtubules, which give cells their structure. However, when Tau proteins become misfolded or otherwise altered, they form clumps that contribute to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and frontotemporal dementia.

Determining the structure of the Tau tangles has been difficult because so much of the protein — about 80 percent — is found in the fuzzy coat, which tends to be highly disordered.

This fuzzy coat surrounds a rigid inner core that is made from folded protein strands known as beta sheets. Hong and her colleagues have previously analyzed the structure of the core in a particular Tau fibril using NMR, which can reveal the structures of molecules by measuring the magnetic properties of atomic nuclei within the molecules.

Until now, most researchers had overlooked Tau’s fuzzy coat and focused on the rigid core of the fibrils because those disordered segments change their structures so often that standard structure characterization techniques such as cryoelectron microscopy and X-ray crystallography can’t capture them.

However, in the new study, the researchers developed NMR techniques that allowed them to study the entire Tau protein. In one experiment, they were able to magnetize protons within the most rigid amino acids, then measure how long it took for the magnetization to be transferred to the mobile amino acids. This allowed them to track the magnetization as it traveled from rigid regions to floppy segments, and vice versa.

Using this approach, the researchers could estimate the proximity between the rigid and mobile segments. They complemented this experiment by measuring the different degrees of movement of the amino acids in the fuzzy coat.

“We have now developed an NMR-based technology to examine the fuzzy coat of a full-length Tau fibril, allowing us to capture both the dynamic regions and the rigid core,” Hong says.

Protein dynamics

For this particular fibril, the researchers showed that the overall structure of the Tau protein, which contains about 10 different domains, somewhat resembles a burrito, with several layers of the fuzzy coat wrapped around the rigid core.

Based on their measurements of protein dynamics, the researchers found that these segments fell into three categories. The rigid core of the fibril was surrounded by protein regions with intermediate mobility, whereas the most dynamic segments were found in the outermost layer.

The most dynamic segments of the fuzzy coat are rich in the amino acid proline. In the protein sequence, these prolines are near the amino acids that form the rigid core, and were previously thought to be partially immobilized. Instead, they are highly mobile, indicating that these positively charged proline-rich regions are repelled by the positive charges of the amino acids that form the rigid core.

This structural model gives insight into how Tau proteins form tangles in the brain, Hong says. Similar to how prions trigger healthy proteins to misfold in the brain, it is believed that misfolded Tau proteins latch onto normal Tau proteins and act as a template that induces them to adopt the abnormal structure.

In principle, these normal Tau proteins could add to the ends of existing short filaments or pile onto the sides. The fact that the fuzzy coat wraps around the rigid core indicates that normal Tau proteins more likely add onto the ends of the filaments to generate longer fibrils.

The researchers now plan to explore whether they can stimulate normal Tau proteins to assemble into the type of fibrils seen in Alzheimer’s disease, using misfolded Tau proteins from Alzheimer’s patients as a template.

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

As a graduate student, Leslie Tilley spent years studying and practicing the music of Bali, Indonesia, including a traditional technique in which two Balinese drummers play intricately interlocking rhythms while simultaneously improvising. It was beautiful and compelling music, which Tilley heard an unexpected insight about one day.

“The higher drum is the bus driver, and the lower drum is the person who puts the bags on the top of the bus,” a Balinese musician told Tilley.

Today, Tilley is an MIT faculty member who works as both an ethnomusicologist, studying music in its cultural settings, and a music theorist, analyzing its formal principles. The tools of music theory have long been applied to, say, Bach, and rather less often to Balinese drumming. But one of Tilley’s interests is building music theory across boundaries. As she recognized, the drummer’s bus driver analogy is a piece of theory. 

“That doesn’t feel like the music theory I had learned, but that is 100 percent music theory,” Tilley said. “What is the relationship between the drummers? The higher drum has to stick to a smaller subset of rhythms so that the lower drum has more freedom to improvise around. Putting it that way is just a different music-theoretical language.”

Tilley’s anecdote touches on many aspects of her career: Her work ranges widely, while linking theory, practice, and learning. Her studies in Bali became the basis for an award-winning book, which uses Balinese music as a case study for a more generalized framework about collective improvisation, one that can apply to any type of music.

Currently, Tilley is engaged in another major project, supported by a multiyear, $500,000 Mellon Foundation grant, to develop a reimagined music theory curriculum. That project aims to produce an alternative four-semester open access music theory curriculum with a broader scope than many existing course materials, to be accompanied by a new audio-visual textbook. The effort includes a major conference later this year that Tilley is organizing, and is designed as a collaborative project; she will work with other scholars on the curriculum and textbook, with 2028 as a completion date.

If that weren’t enough, Tilley is also working on a new book about the phenomenon of cover songs in modern pop music, from the 1950s onward. Here too, Tilley is combining careful cultural analysis of select popular artists and their work, along with a formal examination of the musical choices they have made while developing cover versions of songs.

All told, understanding how music works within a culture, while understanding the inner workings of music, can deliver us new insights — about music, performers, and audiences.

“What I am focused on fundamentally is how musicians take a musical thing and make something new out of it,” Tilley says. “And then how listeners react to that thing. What is happening here musically? And can that explain the human reaction to it, which is messy and subjective?”

Across all these projects, Tilley has been a consistently innovative scholar who reshapes existing genres of work. For her research and teaching, Tilley has received tenure and is now an associate professor in MIT’s Music and Theater Arts Program.

The joy of collective improv

Both of Tilley’s parents were musicians, but “they never had any intention for their kids to go into music,” says Tilley, a native of Halifax, Nova Scotia. Growing up, she studied piano, violin, and French horn for years; played in a symphony orchestra, brass band, and concert bands; sang in choirs; and performed in musicals. Ultimately she realized she could make a career out of music as well. 

“In 12th grade I suddenly realized, music is what I do. Music is who I am. Music is what I love,” Tilley says. Back then, she pictured herself being an opera singer. Subsequently, as she recalls, “Somewhere along the way, I steered myself into music scholarship.”

Tilley received her bachelor of music degree from Acadia University in Nova Scotia, and then conducted her graduate studies in music at the University of British Columbia, where she earned an MA and PhD. It was in graduate school that Tilley began studying the music of Bali — on campus and during extended periods of field research.

Studying Balinese music was “mildly accidental,” Tilley says, calling it “a little bit of happy happenstance. Encountering these musical traditions exploded the way I thought about music and ways of understanding the interactions of musicians.”

In her research, Tilley looked intensively at two distinct improvised Balinese musical practices: the four-person melodic gong technique “reyong norot” and the two-person drumming practice “kendang arja.” Both are featured in her 2019 book, “Making It Up Together: The Art of Collective Improvisation in Balinese Music and Beyond.” Published by the University of Chicago Press, it won the 2022 Emerging Scholar Award from the Society for Music Theory.

Grounded in empirical evidence, the book proposes a novel, universal framework for understanding the components of collective improvisation. That includes both the more strictly musical aspects of improvisation — how much flexibility musicians give themselves to improvise, for instance — as well as the forms of interaction musicians have with their co-performers.

“My book is about collective improvisation and what it means,” Tilley says. “What is the give and take of that process, and how can we analyze that? There are lots of scholars who have discussed collective improvisation as it exists in jazz. The delicious joy of collective improvisation is something anybody who improvises in a musical group will talk about. My book looks at examples, especially the case studies I have from Bali, and then creates bigger analytical frameworks, so there can finally be an umbrella way of looking at this phenomenon across music cultures and practices.”

Despite her years of immersing herself in the music, and playing it, Tilley says, “I am a beginner in comparison to the drummers I studied with, who have been playing forever and played with other masters their whole lives, and were generous enough to allow me to learn from them.” Still, she thinks the experience of playing music while studying it is indispensable.

“Ethnomusicology is a field that takes a bit from other fields,” Tilley notes. “The idea of participant observation, we borrow that from anthropology, and the idea of close musical analysis is from musicology or music theory. It’s an in-between way of thinking about music where I get to both participate and observe. But also I’m a music analysis nerd: What’s happening in the notes? Looking at music note-by-note, but from a place of physical embodiment, provides a better understanding than if I had just looked at the notes.”

Expanding instruction

At present, Tilley is devoting significant effort to her music-theory curriculum work, which is funded by the Mellon Foundation as a three-year effort. The upcoming summer conference she is organizing, also supported by the Mellon Foundation, will be a key part of the project, allowing a wide range of scholars to air perspectives about reimagining music theory studies in the 21st century.

Substantively, the idea is to broaden the scope of music theory instruction. Often, Tilley says, “music theory is learning how to understand the musical structures that are essentially between Bach and early Beethoven, that kind of narrow range of a couple hundred years, really amazing musical systems with a very deep, written-down music theory. But that accepted canon leaves out so many other kinds of music and ways of knowing.” Instead, she adds, “If we were not beholden to any assumptions about what we should have in a music program, what skills would we want our students to walk away from four semesters of music theory with?”

About the conference, Tilley quips: “Sitting in a room and nerding out with a bunch of people who care deeply about a thing you care about, which in my case is music, music theory, and pedagogy, is possibly the coolest thing you can do with your time. Hopefully something wonderful comes out of it.”

As Tilley views it, her current book project on pop music cover songs stems from some of the same issues that have long animated her thinking: How do artists fashion their work out of existing knowledge?

“The project on cover songs is similar to the project on collective improvisation in Bali,” Tilley says, in the sense that when it comes to improvisation, “I have a bank of things I know, in my head and in my body about this musical practice, and within that context I can create something that is new and mine, based on something that exists already.”

She adds: “Cover songs to me are the same, but different. The same in that it’s a musical transformation, but different because a pop song doesn’t just have lyrics, melody, and chords, but the vocal quality, the arrangement, the brand of the performer, and so much more. What we think about in popular music isn’t just the song, it’s the person singing it, the social and political contexts, and the listener’s personal relationships to all those things, and they’re so wrapped up together we almost can’t disentangle them.”

As with her earlier work, Tilley is not just examining individual pieces of music, but building a larger analytical model in the process — one that factors in the formal musical changes artists make as well as the cultural components of the phenomenon, to understand why cover songs can produce strong and varying reactions among listeners.

In the process, Tilley has been presenting conference papers and invited talks on the topic for a number of years now. One case that interests Tilley is the singer-songwriter Tori Amos, whose many cover versions transform the viewpoint, music, and meaning of songs by artists from Eminem to Nirvana, and more. There may also be some Taylor Swift content in the next book, although with thousands and thousands of songs to choose from in the pop-rock era, there could be something for everyone — fitting Tilley’s ethos of studying music broadly, across time and space as it is created, recreated, and recreated again.

“This is why music is infinitely cool,” Tilley says. “It’s so malleable, and so open to interpretation.” 

The mucosal surfaces that line the body are embedded with defensive molecules that help keep microbes from causing inflammation and infections. Among these molecules are lectins — proteins that recognize microbes and other cells by binding to sugars found on cell surfaces.

One of these lectins, MIT researchers have found, has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria found in the GI tract. This lectin, known as intelectin-2, binds to sugar molecules found on bacterial membranes, trapping the bacteria and hindering their growth. Additionally, it can crosslink molecules that make up mucus, helping to strengthen the mucus barrier.

“What’s remarkable is that intelectin-2 operates in two complementary ways. It helps stabilize the mucus layer, and if that barrier is compromised, it can directly neutralize or restrain bacteria that begin to escape,” says Laura Kiessling, the Novartis Professor of Chemistry at MIT and the senior author of the study.

This kind of broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity could make intelectin-2 useful as a potential therapeutic, the researchers say. It could also be harnessed to help strengthen the mucus barrier in patients with disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease.

Amanda Dugan, a former MIT research scientist, and Deepsing Syangtan PhD ’24 are the lead authors of the paper, which appears today in Nature Communications.

A multifunctional protein

Current evidence suggests that the human genome encodes more than 200 lectins — carbohydrate-binding proteins that play a variety of roles in the immune system and in communication between cells. Kiessling’s lab, which has been exploring lectin-carbohydrate interactions, recently became interested in a family of lectins called intelectins. In humans, this family includes two lectins, intelectin-1 and intelectin-2.

Those two proteins have very similar structures, but intelectin-1 is distinctive in that it only binds to carbohydrates found in bacteria and other microbes. About 10 years ago, Kiessling and her colleagues were able to discover intelectin-1’s structure, but its functions are still not fully understood.

At that time, scientists hypothesized that intelectin-2 might play a role in immune defense, but there hadn’t been many studies to support that idea. Dugan, then a postdoc in Kiessling’s lab, set out to learn more about intelectin-2.

In humans, intelectin-2 is produced at steady levels by Paneth cells in the small intestine, but in mice, its expression from mucus-producing Goblet cells appears to be triggered by inflammation and certain types of parasitic infection.

In the new study, the researchers found that both human and mouse intelectin-2 bind to a sugar molecule called galactose. This sugar is commonly found in molecules called mucins that make up mucus. When intelectin-2 binds to these mucins, it helps to strengthen the mucus barrier, the researchers found.

Galactose is also found in carbohydrates displayed on the surfaces of some bacterial cells. The researchers showed that intelectin-2 can bind to microbes that display these sugars, including many pathogens that cause GI infections.

The researchers also found that over time, these trapped microbes eventually disintegrate, suggesting that the protein is able to kill them by disrupting their cell membranes. This antimicrobial activity appears to affect a wide range of bacteria, including some that are resistant to traditional antibiotics.

These dual functions help to protect the lining of the GI tract from infection, the researchers believe.

“Intelectin-2 first reinforces the mucus barrier itself, and then if that barrier is breached, it can control the bacteria and restrict their growth,” Kiessling says.

Fighting off infection

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, intelectin-2 levels can become abnormally high or low. Low levels could contribute to degradation of the mucus barrier, while high levels could kill off too many beneficial bacteria that normally live in the gut. Finding ways to restore the correct levels of intelectin-2 could be beneficial for those patients, the researchers say.

“Our findings show just how critical it is to stabilize the mucus barrier. Looking ahead, we can imagine exploiting lectin properties to design proteins that actively reinforce that protective layer,” Kiessling says.

Because intelectin-2 can neutralize or eliminate pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which are often difficult to treat with antibiotics, it could potentially be adapted as an antimicrobial agent.

“Harnessing human lectins as tools to combat antimicrobial resistance opens up a fundamentally new strategy that draws on our own innate immune defenses,” Kiessling says. “Taking advantage of proteins that the body already uses to protect itself against pathogens is compelling and a direction that we are pursuing.”

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health Glycoscience Common Fund, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and the National Science Foundation.

Other authors who contributed to the study include Charles Bevins, a professor of medical microbiology and immunology at the University of California at Davis School of Medicine; Ramnik Xavier, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; and Katharina Ribbeck, the Andrew and Erna Viterbi Professor of Biological Engineering at MIT.

Many people are optimistic about ammonia’s potential as an energy source and carrier of hydrogen, and though large-scale adoption would require major changes to the way it is currently manufactured, ammonia does have a number of advantages. For one thing, ammonia is energy-dense and carbon-free. It is also already produced at scale and shipped around the world, primarily for use in fertilizer.

Though current manufacturing processes give ammonia an enormous carbon footprint, cleaner ways to make ammonia do exist. A better understanding of how to guide the ammonia fuel industry’s continued development could improve carbon emissions, energy costs, and regional energy balances.

In a new paper, MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) researchers created the largest combined dataset showing the economic and environmental impact of global ammonia supply chains under different scenarios. They examined potential ammonia flows across 63 countries and considered a variety of country-specific economic parameters as well as low- and no-carbon ammonia production technologies. The results should help researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders calculate the cost and lifecycle emissions of different ammonia production technologies and trade routes.

“This is the most comprehensive work on the global ammonia landscape,” says senior author Guiyan Zang, a research scientist at MITEI. “We developed many of these frameworks at MIT to be able to make better cost-benefit analyses. Hydrogen and ammonia are the only two types of fuel with no carbon at scale. If we want to use fuel to generate power and heat, but not release carbon, hydrogen and ammonia are the only options, and ammonia is easier to transport and lower-cost.”

The study provides the clearest view yet of the tradeoffs associated with various ammonia production technologies. The researchers found, for instance, that a full transition to ammonia produced using conventional processes paired with carbon capture could cut global greenhouse gas emissions by nearly 71 percent for a 23.2 percent cost increase. A transition to electrolyzed ammonia produced using renewable energy could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 99.7 percent for a 46 percent cost increase.

“Before this, there were no harmonized datasets quantifying the impacts of this transition,” says lead author Woojae Shin, a postdoc at MITEI. “Everyone is talking about ammonia as a super important hydrogen carrier in the future, and also ammonia can be directly used in power generation or fertilizer and other industrial uses. But we needed this dataset. It’s filling a major knowledge gap.”

The paper appears in Energy and Environmental Science. Former MITEI postdocs Haoxiang Lai and Gasim Ibrahim are also co-authors.

Filling a data gap

Today ammonia is mainly produced through the Haber-Bosch process, which in 2020 was responsible for about 1.8 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. Although current ammonia production is energy-intensive and polluting (referred to as gray ammonia), ammonia can also be produced sustainably using renewable sources (green ammonia) or with natural gas and carbon sequestration (blue ammonia).

As ammonia has increasingly attracted interest as a carbon-free energy source and a medium for hydrogen transport, it’s become more important to quantify the costs and life-cycle emissions associated with various ammonia production technologies, as well as ammonia storage and shipping routes. But existing studies were too narrowly focused.

“The previous studies and datasets were fragmented,” Shin says. “They focused on specific regions or single technologies, like gray ammonia only, or blue ammonia only. They would also only cover the cost or the greenhouse emissions of ammonia in isolation. Finally, they use different scopes and methodologies. It meant you couldn’t make global comparisons or draw definitive conclusions.”

To build their database, the MIT researchers combined data from dozens of studies analyzing specific technologies, regions, economic parameters, and trade flows. They also used frameworks they previously developed to calculate the total cost of ammonia production in each country and estimated lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions across the supply chain, factoring in storage and shipping between different regions.

Emissions calculations included activities related to feedstock extraction, production, transport, and import processing. Major cost factors included each country’s renewable and grid electricity prices, natural gas prices, and location. Other factors like interest rates and equity premiums were also included.

The researchers used their calculations to find ammonia costs and life cycle emissions across six ammonia production technologies. In the context of the U.S. average, they found the lowest production cost came from using a popular form of the Haber Bosch process known as natural gas steam methane reforming (SMR) without carbon capture and storage (gray ammonia), at 48 cents per kilogram of ammonia. Unfortunately, that economic advantage came with the highest greenhouse gas emissions, at 2.46 kilograms of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of ammonia. In contrast, SMR with carbon capture and storage achieves an approximately 61 percent reduction in emissions while incurring a 29 percent increase in production costs.

Another method for producing ammonia that uses natural gas as a feedstock called auto-thermal reforming (ATR) with air combustion, when combined with carbon capture and storage, exhibited a 10 percent higher cost than conventional SMR while generating emissions of 0.75 kilograms of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of ammonia, representing a more cost-effective decarbonization option than SMR with carbon capture and storage.

Among production pathways including carbon capture (blue ammonia), a variation of ATR that uses oxygen combustion and carbon capture had the lowest emissions, with a production cost of about 57 cents per kilogram of ammonia. Producing ammonia with electricity generally had higher production costs than blue ammonia pathways. When nuclear energy is powering ammonia production, as opposed to the grid, greenhouse gas emissions are near zero at 0.03 kilograms of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of ammonia produced.

Across the 63 countries studied, major cost and emissions differences were driven by energy costs, sources of energy for the grid, and financing environments. China emerged as an optimal future supplier of green ammonia to many countries, while the Middle East also offered competitive low-carbon ammonia production pathways. Generally, blue ammonia pathways are most attractive for countries with low-cost natural gas resources, and ammonia made using grid electricity proved more expensive and more carbon-intensive than conventionally produced ammonia.

From data to policy

Low-carbon ammonia use is projected to grow dramatically by 2050, with that ammonia procured via global trade. Japan and Korea, for example, have included ammonia in their national energy strategies and conducted trials using ammonia to generate power. They even offer economic credits for verified CO2 reductions from clean ammonia projects.

“Ammonia researchers, producers, as well as government officials require this data to understand the impact of different technologies and global supply corridors,” Shin says.

The authors also believe industry stakeholders and other researchers will get a lot of value from their database, which allows users to explore the impact of changing specific parameters.

“We collaborate with companies, and they need to know the full costs and lifecycle emissions associated with different options,” Zang says. “Governments can also use this to compare options and set future policies. Any country producing ammonia needs to know which countries they can deliver to economically.”

The research was supported by the MIT Energy Initiative’s Future Energy Systems Center.

Consciousness is famously a “hard problem” of science: We don’t precisely know how the physical matter in our brains translates into thoughts, sensations, and feelings. But an emerging research tool called transcranial focused ultrasound may enable researchers to learn more about the phenomenon.

The technology has entered use in recent years, but it isn’t yet fully integrated into research. Now, two MIT researchers are planning experiments with it, and have published a new paper they term a “roadmap” for using the tool to study consciousness.

“Transcranial focused ultrasound will let you stimulate different parts of the brain in healthy subjects, in ways you just couldn’t before,” says Daniel Freeman, an MIT researcher and co-author of a new paper on the subject. “This is a tool that’s not just useful for medicine or even basic science, but could also help address the hard problem of consciousness. It can probe where in the brain are the neural circuits that generate a sense of pain, a sense of vision, or even something as complex as human thought.”

Transcranial focused ultrasound is noninvasive and reaches deeper into the brain, with greater resolution, than other forms of brain stimulation, such as transcranial magnetic or electrical stimulation.

“There are very few reliable ways of manipulating brain activity that are safe but also work,” says Matthias Michel, an MIT philosopher who studies consciousness and co-authored the new work.

The paper, “Transcranial focused ultrasound for identifying the neural substrate of conscious perception,” is published in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. The authors are Freeman, a technical staff member at MIT Lincoln Laboratory; Brian Odegaard, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Florida; Seung-Schik Yoo, an associate professor of radiology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School; and Michel, an associate professor in MIT’s Department of Philosophy and Linguistics.

Pinpointing causality

Brain research is especially difficult because of the challenge of studying healthy individuals. Apart from neurosurgery, there are very limited ways to gain knowledge of the deepest structures in the human brain. From the outside of the head, noninvasive approaches like MRIs and other kinds of ultrasounds yield some imaging information, while the electroencephalogram (EEG) shows electrical activity in the brain. Conversely, with transcranial focused ultrasound, acoustic waves are transmitted through the skull, focusing down to a target area of a few millimeters, allowing specific brain structures to be stimulated to study the resulting effect. It could therefore be a productive tool for robust experiments.

“It truly is the first time in history that one can modulate activity deep in the brain, centimeters from the scalp, examining subcortical structures with high spatial resolution,” Freeman says. “There’s a lot of interesting emotional circuits that are deep in the brain, but until now you couldn’t manipulate them outside of the operating room.”

Crucially, the technology may help researchers determine cause-and-effect patterns, precisely because its ultrasound waves modulate brain activity. Many studies of consciousness today may measure brain activity in relation to, say, visual stumuli, since visual processing is among the core components of consciousness. But it’s not necessarily clear if the brain activity being measured represents the generation of consciousness, or a mere consequence of consciousness. By manipulating the brain’s activity, researchers can better grasp which actions help constitute consciousness, or are byproducts of it.

“Transcranial focused ultrasound gives us a solution to that problem,” says Michel.

The “roadmap” laid out in the new paper aims to help distinguish between two main conceptions of consciousness. Broadly, the “cognitivist” conception holds that the neural activity that generates conscious experience must involve higher-level mental processes, such as reasoning or self-reflection. These processes link information from many different parts of the brain into a coherent whole, likely using the frontal cortex of the brain.

By contrast, the “non-cognitivist” idea of consciousness takes the position that conscious experience does not require such cognitive machinery; instead, specific patterns of neural activity give rise directly to particular subjective experiences, without the need for sophisticated interpretive processes. In this view, brain activity responsible for consciousness may be more localized, at the back of the cortex or in subcortical structures at the back of the brain.

To use transcranial focused ultrasound productively, the researchers lay out a series of more specific questions that experiments might address: What is the role of the prefrontal cortex in conscious perception? Is perception generated locally, or are brain-wide networks required? If consciousness arises across distant regions of the brain, how are perceptions from those areas linked into one unified experience? And what is the role of subcortical structures in conscious activity?

By modulating brain activity in experiments involving, say, visual stimuli, researchers could draw closer to answers about the brain areas that are necessary in the production of conscious thought. The same goes for studies of, for instance, pain, another core sensation linked with consciousness. We pull our hand back from a hot stove before the pain hits us. But how is the conscious sensation of pain generated, and where in the brain does that happen?

“It’s a basic science question, how is pain generated in the brain,” Freeman says. “And it’s surprising there is such uncertainty … Pain could stem from cortical areas, or it could be deeper brain structures. I’m interested in therapies, but I’m also curious if subcortical structures may play a bigger role than appreciated. It could be the physical manifestation of pain is subcortical. That’s a hypothesis. But now we have a tool to examine it.”

Experiments ahead

Freeman and Michel are not just abstractly charting a course for others to follow; they are planning forthcoming experiments centered on stimulation of the visual cortex, before moving on to higher-level areas in frontal cortex. While methods of recording brain activity, such as an EEG reveal areas that are visually responsive, these new experiments are aiming to build a more complete, causal picture of the entire process of visual perception and its associated brain activity.

“It’s one thing to say if these neurons reponded electrically. It’s another thing to say if a person saw light,” Freeman says.

Michel, for his part, is also playing an active role in generating further interest in studies of consciousness at MIT. Along with Earl Miller, the Picower Professor of Neuroscience in MIT’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Michel is a co-founder of the MIT Consciousness Club, a cross-disciplinary effort to spur further academic study of consciousness, on campus and at other Boston-area institutions.

The MIT Consciousness Club is supported in part by MITHIC, the MIT Human Insight Collaborative, an initiative backed by the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences. The program aims to hold monthly events, while grappling with the cutting edge of consciousness research.

At the moment, Michel believes, the cutting edge very much involves transcranial focused ultrasound.

“It’s a new tool, so we don’t really know to what extent it’s going to work,” Michel says. “But I feel there’s low risk and high reward. Why wouldn’t you take this path?”

The research for the paper was supported by the U.S. Department of the Air Force. 

Going to the moon was one thing; going to Mars will be quite another. The distance alone is intimidating. While the moon is 238,855 miles away, the distance to Mars is between 33 million and 249 million miles. The propulsion systems that got us to the moon just won’t work.

Taylor Hampson, a master’s student in the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering (NSE), is well aware of the problem. It’s one of the many reasons he’s excited about his NASA-sponsored research into nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP).

The technique uses nuclear energy to heat a propellant, like hydrogen, to an extremely high temperature and expel it through a nozzle. The resultant thrust can significantly reduce travel times to Mars, compared to chemical rockets. “You can get double the efficiency, or more, from a nuclear propulsion engine with the same thrust. Besides, being in microgravity is not ideal for astronauts, so you want to get them there faster, which is a strong motivation for using nuclear propulsion over the chemical equivalents,” Hampson says.

Understanding nuclear thermal propulsion

It’s worth taking a quick survey of rocket propulsion techniques to understand where Hampson’s work fits.

There are three broad types of rocket propulsion: chemical, where thrust is achieved by the combustion of rocket propellants; electrical, where electric fields accelerate charged particles to high velocities to achieve thrust; and nuclear, where nuclear energy delivers needed propulsion.

Nuclear propulsion, which is only used in space, not to get to space, further falls into one of two categories: nuclear electric propulsion uses nuclear energy to generate electricity and accelerate the propellant. Nuclear thermal propulsion, which is what Hampson is researching, heats a propellant using nuclear power. A significant advantage of NTP is that it can deliver double the efficiency (or more) of the chemical equivalent for the same thrust. A disadvantage: cost and regulatory hurdles. “Sure, you can get double the efficiency or more from a nuclear propulsion engine, but there hasn’t been a mission case that has needed it enough to justify the higher cost,” Hampson says.

Until now.

With a human mission to Mars becoming a very real possibility — NASA plans on sending astronauts to Mars as early as the 2030s — NTP might soon come under the spotlight.

"It's almost futuristic"

Growing up on Florida’s Space Coast and watching space shuttle launches stoked Hampson’s early interest in science. Loving many other subjects, including history and math, it wasn’t until his senior year that Hampson cast his lot into the engineering category. While space exploration got him hooked on aerospace engineering, Hampson was also intrigued by the possibility of nuclear engineering as a way to a greener future.

Wracked by indecision, he applied to schools in both fields and completed his undergraduate degree in aerospace engineering from Georgia Tech. It was here that a series of internships in space technology companies like Blue Origin and Stoke Space, and participation in Georgia Tech’s rocket team, cemented Hampson’s love for rocket propulsion.

Looking to pursue graduate studies, MIT seemed like the next logical step. “I think MIT has the best combination of nuclear and aerospace education, and is really strong in the field of testing nuclear fuels,” Hampson says. Facilities in the MIT Reactor enable testing of nuclear fuel under conditions they would see in a nuclear propulsion engine. It helped that Koroush Shirvan, associate professor of NSE and Atlantic Richfield Career Development Professor in Energy Studies, was working on nuclear thermal propulsion efforts with NASA while focusing most of his efforts on the testing of nuclear fuels.

At MIT, Hampson works under the advisement of Shirvan. Hampson has had the chance to pursue further research in a project he started with an internship at NASA: studies of a nuclear thermal propulsion engine. “Nuclear propulsion is itself advanced, and I’m working on what comes after that. It’s almost futuristic,” he says.

Modeling the effects of nuclear thermal propulsion

While the premise of NTP sounds promising, its execution will likely not be straightforward. For one thing, with NTP, the rocket engine won’t start up and shut down like simple combustion engines. The startup is complex because rapid increase in temperatures can cause material failures. And the engines can take longer to shut down because of heat from nuclear decay. As a result, the components have to continue to be cooled until enough fission products decay away so there isn’t a lot of heat left, Hampson says.

Hampson is modeling the entirety of the rocket engine system — the tank, the pump, and more — to understand how these and many other parameters work together. Evaluating the entire engine is important because different configurations of parts (and even the fuel) can affect performance. To simplify calculations and to have simulations run faster, he’s working with a relatively simple one-dimensional model. Using it, Hampson can follow the effects of variables on parameters like temperature and pressure on each of the components throughout the engine operation.

“The challenge is in coupling the thermodynamic effects with the neutronic effects,” he says.

Ready for more challenges ahead

After years of indecision, delaying practically every academics-related decision to the last minute, Hampson seems to have zeroed in on what he expects to be his life’s work — inspired by the space shuttle launches many years ago — and hopes to pursue doctoral studies after graduation.

Hampson always welcomes a challenge, and it’s what motivates him to run. Training for the Boston Marathon, he fractured his leg, an injury that surfaced when he was running for yet another race, the Beantown Marathon. He’s not bowed by the incident. “I learned that you’re a lot more capable than you think,” Hampson says, “although you have to ask yourself about the cost,” he laughs. (He was in crutches for weeks after).

A thirst for a challenge is also one of the many reasons he chose to research thermal nuclear propulsion. It helps that the research indulges his love for the field. “Relatively speaking, it’s a field in need of much more advancement; there are many more unsolved problems,” he says. 

MIT is often recognized as one of the leading institutions of higher learning not only in the United States, but in the world, by several publications, including U.S. News & World Report, QS World University Rankings, Times Higher Education, and Forbes.

Now, MIT also has the distinction of being one of just 30 colleges and universities out of hundreds recognized by Princeton Review’s 2026 Mental Health Services Honor Roll for providing exemplary mental health and well-being services to its students. This is the second year in a row that MIT has received this honor.

The honor roll was created to be a resource for enrolled students and prospective students who may seek such services when applying to colleges. The survey asked more than a dozen questions about training for students, faculty, and staff; provisions for making new policies and procedures; peer-to-peer offerings; screenings and referral services available to all students; residence hall mental health resources; and other criteria, such as current online information that is updated and accessible.

Overall, the 2025 survey findings for all participating institutions are noteworthy, with Princeton Review reporting double-digit increases in campus counseling, wellness, and student support programs compared with its 2024 survey results. Earning a place on the honor roll underscores MIT’s commitment to providing exceptional services for graduate and undergraduate students alike.

Karen Singleton, deputy chief health officer and chief of mental health and counseling services at MIT Health, says, “This honor highlights the hard work and collaboration that we do here at MIT to support students in their well-being journey. This is a recognition of how we are doing those things effectively, and a recognition of MIT’s investment in these support services.”

MIT Health hosts 36 clinicians to meet the needs of the community, and it recently added an easy online scheduling system at the request of students.

Many mental health and well-being services are offered through several departments housed in the Division of Student Life (DSL). They often collaborate with MIT Health and partners across the Institute, including in the Division of Graduate and Undergraduate Education, to provide the best services for the best outcomes for MIT students. 

Support resources in DSL are highly utilized and valued by students. For instance, 82 percent of the Class of 2025 had visited Student Support Services (S3) at least once before graduating, and on a regular satisfaction survey, 91 percent of students who visited S3 said they would return if needed.

“Student Support Services supports over 80 percent of all undergraduates by the time they graduate, and over 60 percent each year. Our offices, including ORSEL, GradSupport, S3, SMHC, the CARE Team, and Residential and Community Life work incredibly well together to support our students,” says Kate McCarthy, senior associate dean of support, wellbeing, and belonging.

“The magic in our support system is the deeply collaborative nature of it. There are many different places students can enter the support network, and each of these teams works closely together to ensure students get connected to the help they need. We always say that students shouldn’t think too much about where they turn … if they get to one of us, they get to all of us,” says David Randall, dean of student life.

Division of Student Life Vice Chancellor Suzy Nelson adds, “It is an honor to see MIT included among colleges and universities recognized for excellent mental health services. Promoting student well-being is central to our mission and guides so much of what we do. This recognition reflects the work of many in our community who are dedicated to creating a campus environment where students can thrive academically and personally.”

Artificial intelligence has captured headlines recently for its rapidly growing energy demands, and particularly the surging electricity usage of data centers that enable the training and deployment of the latest generative AI models. But it’s not all bad news — some AI tools have the potential to reduce some forms of energy consumption and enable cleaner grids.

One of the most promising applications is using AI to optimize the power grid, which would improve efficiency, increase resilience to extreme weather, and enable the integration of more renewable energy. To learn more, MIT News spoke with Priya Donti, the Silverman Family Career Development Professor in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and a principal investigator at the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS), whose work focuses on applying machine learning to optimize the power grid.

Q: Why does the power grid need to be optimized in the first place?

A: We need to maintain an exact balance between the amount of power that is put into the grid and the amount that comes out at every moment in time. But on the demand side, we have some uncertainty. Power companies don’t ask customers to pre-register the amount of energy they are going to use ahead of time, so some estimation and prediction must be done.

Then, on the supply side, there is typically some variation in costs and fuel availability that grid managers need to be responsive to. That has become an even bigger issue because of the integration of energy from time-varying renewable sources, like solar and wind, where uncertainty in the weather can have a major impact on how much power is available. Then, at the same time, depending on how power is flowing in the grid, there is some power lost through resistive heat on the power lines. So, as a grid operator, how do you make sure all that is working all the time? That is where optimization comes in.

Q: How can AI be most useful in power grid optimization?

A: One way AI can be helpful is to use a combination of historical and real-time data to make more precise predictions about how much renewable energy will be available at a certain time. This could lead to a cleaner power grid by allowing us to handle and better utilize these resources.

AI could also help tackle the complex optimization problems that power grid operators must solve to balance supply and demand in a way that also reduces costs. These optimization problems are used to determine which power generators should produce power, how much they should produce, and when they should produce it, as well as when batteries should be charged and discharged, and whether we can leverage flexibility in power loads. These optimization problems are so computationally expensive that operators use approximations so they can solve them in a feasible amount of time. But these approximations are often wrong, and when we integrate more renewable energy into the grid, they are thrown off even farther. AI can help by providing more accurate approximations in a faster manner, which can be deployed in real-time to help grid operators responsively and proactively manage the grid.

AI could also be useful in the planning of next-generation power grids. Planning for power grids requires one to use huge simulation models, so AI can play a big role in running those models more efficiently. The technology can also help with predictive maintenance by detecting where anomalous behavior on the grid is likely to happen, reducing inefficiencies that come from outages. More broadly, AI could also be applied to accelerate experimentation aimed at creating better batteries, which would allow the integration of more energy from renewable sources into the grid.

Q: How should we think about the pros and cons of AI, from an energy sector perspective?

A: One important thing to remember is that AI refers to a heterogeneous set of technologies. There are different types and sizes of models that are used, and different ways that models are used. If you are using a model that is trained on a smaller amount of data with a smaller number of parameters, that is going to consume much less energy than a large, general-purpose model.

In the context of the energy sector, there are a lot of places where, if you use these application-specific AI models for the applications they are intended for, the cost-benefit tradeoff works out in your favor. In these cases, the applications are enabling benefits from a sustainability perspective — like incorporating more renewables into the grid and supporting decarbonization strategies.

Overall, it’s important to think about whether the types of investments we are making into AI are actually matched with the benefits we want from AI. On a societal level, I think the answer to that question right now is “no.” There is a lot of development and expansion of a particular subset of AI technologies, and these are not the technologies that will have the biggest benefits across energy and climate applications. I’m not saying these technologies are useless, but they are incredibly resource-intensive, while also not being responsible for the lion’s share of the benefits that could be felt in the energy sector.

I’m excited to develop AI algorithms that respect the physical constraints of the power grid so that we can credibly deploy them. This is a hard problem to solve. If an LLM says something that is slightly incorrect, as humans, we can usually correct for that in our heads. But if you make the same magnitude of a mistake when you are optimizing a power grid, that can cause a large-scale blackout. We need to build models differently, but this also provides an opportunity to benefit from our knowledge of how the physics of the power grid works.

And more broadly, I think it’s critical that those of us in the technical community put our efforts toward fostering a more democratized system of AI development and deployment, and that it’s done in a way that is aligned with the needs of on-the-ground applications.

MIT’s senior capstone course 2.009 (Product Engineering Processes), an iconic class known colloquially on campus as “two double-oh nine,” emulates what engineers experience while working as part of a design team at a product development firm. The annual prototype launch is a colorful and exciting culmination of a semester’s worth of work.

“This fall, 97 students split into six teams entered the rapid-fire cycle of product engineering, looping between ideas, prototypes, failures, fixes, and breakthroughs,” said Josh Wiesman, 2.009 lecturer, in the program’s opening remarks. “They pushed themselves out of their comfort zone and learned to oscillate between creativity and technical rigor. Thermal, fluids, mechanics, materials, instrumentation — everything you can imagine came back around in new and unexpected ways.”

Wiesman’s remarks hinted at this year’s theme, which co-instructor Peko Hosoi, the Pappalardo Professor of Mechanical Engineering, reminded spectators was announced this year as “Cycles!”

“Engineering doesn’t move in a straight line,” Hosoi elaborated. “It loops, it resets, accelerates, and builds momentum, just like our students.” She continued, “Tonight, we’re celebrating the energy, grit, and creativity that comes from embracing those cycles.”

Starting with ideation, the teams ventured out to talk to people from a variety of walks of life and uncover what Hosoi referred to as “exciting problems worth solving.” From there — with mentors, access to makerspaces, and a budget to turn their ideas into working products — the teams, each represented by a color, spent 13 weeks designing, building, and drafting a business plan for their product.

Spectators packed Kresge Auditorium on Dec. 8, waiving colorful pompoms and cheering on the teams, with thousands more watching online. The six teams demonstrated their prototypes and shared business plans, with breaks between presentations featuring dance and musical performances by MIT Ridonkulous, MIT Ohms, and MIT Live, and short animated films created by the 2.009 team which, this year, incorporated popular movie references.

A recording of the event livestream is available on the 2.009 website, which includes full demonstrations of the product prototypes discussed below, along with audience questions.

Green Team

In the United States, some 350,000 people suffer cardiac arrest each year. Immediate intervention by bystanders can be the difference between life and death. The Green Team presented HeartBridge, an automated CPR device.

“For every minute someone who needs it goes without effective CPR, their chance of survival decreases by roughly 10 percent,” Green Team presenters told the audience. But, they added, CPR is exhausting at the recommended speed and compression depth, with research showing decreases in effectiveness of manual compressions after just three minutes.

HeartBridge is a durable mechanical device that administers steady compressions to a patient and provides textual, visual, and auditory cues to users.

Purple Team

The Purple Team painted the picture of a quintessential fall activity in New England, inviting the audience to imagine “it’s a beautiful Saturday in October, and you decide to go apple picking.” At family-run orchards, thousands of apples fall to the ground each season, creating more than just a mess. Rotting apples invite pests or can spread fungus, decreasing crop yield.

AgriSweep, the Purple Team’s prototype, is a hydraulic powered tractor attachment that collects fallen apples into a produce bin, saving time and labor costs, decreasing the need for sprays, and potentially generating revenue for farmers who sell the windfalls for hard cider, livestock feed, or compost.

Nodding to the video references punctuating the show, the team closed their presentation with a reference to an iconic film with an MIT connection: “How do you like them apples?”

Red Team

Hand embroidery is a popular pastime, but drawing or transferring patterns can be time-consuming or messy. The Red Team aims to solve this problem with their product, Scribbly, a “user-friendly and software-free printer” designed to let hobbyists to create their own designs and make transfers easier.

The machine, which can accommodate a variety of fabrics and embroidery hoop sizes up to 10 inches in diameter, reads design files from a USB, then transfers the image via a pen that can be “erased” with heat if the user wants to change the design.

To demonstrate their product, the team created a transfer pattern of the MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering logo.

Blue Team

Boating safety was top-of-mind for the Blue Team. Propeller-related injuries are a big concern for recreational boaters. Fixed propeller guards, or prop guards, are the most common solution but have drawbacks, including reducing fuel efficiency and decreasing maneuverability. DORI, the Blue Team prototype, is a deployable prop guard that is stowed above the waterline and can be lowered into place when needed.

Yellow Team

The Yellow Team tackled a problem faced by “pond skating enthusiasts and people who maintain their own backyard rinks,” namely, rough patches, bumps, and uneven ice. Their product, Polar, is a compact device that smooths out backyard surfaces to improve skate-ability.

The system includes a chassis on a welded steel frame with a motorized drivetrain, a cutter to shave the ice surface, and an onboard water distribution system with heating mechanism and drip bar for resurfacing.

Pink Team

The final team of the night, the Pink Team, conquered a challenge rooted in one of the most demanding and real-world contexts: rescue diving. In a drowning emergency, rescue divers have just minutes to save a life. Using a retractable strap, carabiner, and locking mechanism, the Pink Team’s product, HydroHold, attaches directly to a diver’s buoyancy control device and offers a hands-free way to secure a drowning victim during a rescue mission.

The product was developed following consultations with divers from local fire departments, the state police, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. “When we took these prototypes to rescue divers, we heard them ask for two things over and over,” the presenters said. “Something simple, and something safe.”

Rather than choosing complexity, Hosoi told the audience, the Pink Team pursued refinement. “They kept testing with users, shaping the interface, and polishing the details until everything felt natural.”

Wiesman added that the product is a reminder that “powerful engineering isn’t about flashy things … sometimes it’s about reducing friction, elevating usability, and building something that just works when it matters.”

Thank you and goodnight

The night ended with a final “thank you” song celebrating the products, the teams, and all the contributors who make the class possible because, as Hosoi said, “It really does take a team to make this class ‘cycle’ forward.” 

The clever AI-generated tribute, which weaves in the names of class participants and instructors, while rhyming “pizza with pepperoni” and “pond-sized Zamboni,” can also be watched in its entirety at the end of the livestream recording, following the product demonstrations. 

Every autumn, as the Northern Hemisphere moves toward winter, Judah Cohen starts to piece together a complex atmospheric puzzle. Cohen, a research scientist in MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), has spent decades studying how conditions in the Arctic set the course for winter weather throughout Europe, Asia, and North America. His research dates back to his postdoctoral work with Bacardi and Stockholm Water Foundations Professor Dara Entekhabi that looked at snow cover in the Siberian region and its connection with winter forecasting.

Cohen’s outlook for the 2025–26 winter highlights a season characterized by indicators emerging from the Arctic using a new generation of artificial intelligence tools that help develop the full atmospheric picture.

Looking beyond the usual climate drivers

Winter forecasts rely heavily on El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) diagnostics, which are the tropical Pacific Ocean and atmosphere conditions that influence weather around the world. However, Cohen notes that ENSO is relatively weak this year.

“When ENSO is weak, that’s when climate indicators from the Arctic becomes especially important,” Cohen says.

Cohen monitors high-latitude diagnostics in his subseasonal forecasting, such as October snow cover in Siberia, early-season temperature changes, Arctic sea-ice extent, and the stability of the polar vortex. “These indicators can tell a surprisingly detailed story about the upcoming winter,” he says. 

One of Cohen’s most consistent data predictors is October’s weather in Siberia. This year, when the Northern Hemisphere experienced an unusually warm October, Siberia was colder than normal with an early snow fall. “Cold temperatures paired with early snow cover tend to strengthen the formation of cold air masses that can later spill into Europe and North America,” says Cohen — weather patterns that are historically linked to more frequent cold spells later in winter.

Warm ocean temperatures in the Barents–Kara Sea and an “easterly” phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation also suggest a potentially weaker polar vortex in early winter. When this disturbance couples with surface conditions in December, it leads to lower-than-normal temperatures across parts of Eurasia and North America earlier in the season.

AI subseasonal forecasting

While AI weather models have made impressive strides showcasing in short-range (one-to–10-day) forecasts, these advances have not yet applied to longer periods. The subseasonal prediction covering two to six weeks remains one of the toughest challenges in the field.

That gap is why this year could be a turning point for subseasonal weather forecasting. A team of researchers working with Cohen won first place for the fall season in the 2025 AI WeatherQuest subseasonal forecasting competition, held by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The challenge evaluates how well AI models capture temperature patterns over multiple weeks, where forecasting has been historically limited.

The winning model combined machine-learning pattern recognition with the same Arctic diagnostics Cohen has refined over decades. The system demonstrated significant gains in multi-week forecasting, surpassing leading AI and statistical baselines.

“If this level of performance holds across multiple seasons, it could represent a real step forward for subseasonal prediction,” Cohen says

The model also detected a potential cold surge in mid-December for the U.S. East Coast much earlier than usual, weeks before such signals typically arise. The forecast was widely publicized in the media in real-time. If validated, Cohen explains, it would show how combining Arctic indicators with AI could extend the lead time for predicting impactful weather.

“Flagging a potential extreme event three to four weeks in advance would be a watershed moment,” he adds. “It would give utilities, transportation systems, and public agencies more time to prepare.”

What this winter may hold

Cohen’s model shows a greater chance of colder-than-normal conditions across parts of Eurasia and central North America later in the winter, with the strongest anomalies likely mid-season.

“We’re still early, and patterns can shift,” Cohen says. “But the ingredients for a colder winter pattern are there.”

As Arctic warming speeds up, its impact on winter behavior is becoming more evident, making it increasingly important to understand these connections for energy planning, transportation, and public safety. Cohen’s work shows that the Arctic holds untapped subseasonal forecasting power, and AI may help unlock it for time frames that have long been challenging for traditional models.

In November, Cohen even appeared as a clue in The Washington Post crossword, a small sign of how widely his research has entered public conversations about winter weather.

“For me, the Arctic has always been the place to watch,” he says. “Now AI is giving us new ways to interpret its signals.”

Cohen will continue to update his outlook throughout the season on his blog.

At MIT, a strong spirit of mentorship shapes how students learn, collaborate, and imagine the future. In a time of accelerating change — from breakthroughs in artificial intelligence to the evolving realities of global research and work — guidance for technical challenges and personal growth is more important than ever. 

The Committed to Caring (C2C) program recognizes the outstanding professors who extend this dedication beyond the classroom, nurturing resilience, curiosity, and compassion in a new generation of innovators. The latest cohort of C2C honorees exemplify these values, demonstrating the lasting impact that faculty can have on students’ academic and personal journeys.

The Committed to Caring program is a student-driven initiative that has celebrated exceptional mentorship since 2014. In this cycle, 18 MIT professors have been selected as recipients of the C2C award for 2025-27, joining the ranks of nearly 100 previous honorees. 

The following faculty members comprise the 2025-27 Committed to Caring cohort:

• Iwnetim Abate, Department of Materials Science and Engineering
• Abdullah Almaatouq, MIT Sloan School of Management
• Marc A. Baldo, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
• Anantha P. Chandrakasan, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
• Anna-Christina Eilers, Department of Physics
• Herbert Einstein, Department of Civil and Environment Engineering
• Dennis M. Freeman, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
• Daniel Hidalgo, Department of Political Science
• Erin Kara, Department of Physics
• Laura Lewis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
• Lina Necib, Department of Physics
• Sara Prescott, Department of Biology
• Ellen Roche, Department of Mechanical Engineering
• Loza Tadesse, Department of Mechanical Engineering
• Haruko Murakami Wainwright, Department of Nuclear Science
• Fan Wang, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
• Forest White, Department of Biological Engineering
• Bin Zhang, Department of Chemistry

Since its launch, the C2C program has placed students at the heart of its nomination process. Graduate students across all departments are invited to share letters recognizing faculty whose mentorship has made a lasting impact on their academic and personal journeys. A selection committee, consisting of both graduate students and staff, reviews nominations to identify those who have meaningfully strengthened the graduate community at MIT.

The selection committee this year included: Zoë Wright (Office of Graduate Education, or OGE), Ryan Rideau, Elizabeth Guttenberg (OGE), Beth Marois (OGE), Sharikka Finley-Moise (OGE), Indrani Saha (History, Theory, and Criticism of Art and Architecture, OGE), Chen Liang (graduate student, MIT Sloan School of Management), Jasmine Aloor (grad student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics), Leila Hudson (grad student, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science), and Chair Suraiya Baluch (OGE).

“I wanted to be part of this committee after nominating my own professor in the last cycle, and the experience has been incredibly meaningful,” says Aloor. “I was continually amazed by the ways that so many professors show deep care for their students behind the scenes … What stood out to me most was the breadth of ways these faculty members support their students, check in on them, provide mentorship, and cultivate lifelong bonds, despite being successful and pressed for time as leaders at the top Institute in the world.”

Guttenberg agrees, saying, “Even when these gestures appear simple, they leave a profound and lasting impact on students’ lives and help cultivate the thriving academic community we value.”

Nomination letters illustrate how the efforts of these MIT faculty reflect a deep and enduring commitment to their students’ growth, well-being, and sense of purpose. Their advisees praise these educators for their consistent impact beyond lectures and labs, and for fostering inclusion, support, and genuine connection. Their care and guidance cultivates spaces where students are encouraged not only to excel academically, but also to develop confidence, balance, and a clearer vision of their goals.

Liang underlined that the selection experience “has shown me how many faculty at MIT … help students grow into thoughtful, independent researchers and, just as importantly, into fuller versions of themselves in the world.”

In the months ahead, a series of articles will showcase the honorees in pairs, with a reception this April to recognize their lasting impact. By highlighting these faculty, the Committed to Caring program continues to celebrate and strengthen MIT’s culture of mentorship, respect, and collaboration. 

In an advance that could help ensure people are taking their medication on schedule, MIT engineers have designed a pill that can report when it has been swallowed.

The new reporting system, which can be incorporated into existing pill capsules, contains a biodegradable radio frequency antenna. After it sends out the signal that the pill has been consumed, most components break down in the stomach while a tiny RF chip passes out of the body through the digestive tract.

This type of system could be useful for monitoring transplant patients who need to take immunosuppressive drugs, or people with infections such as HIV or TB, who need treatment for an extended period of time, the researchers say.

“The goal is to make sure that this helps people receive the therapy they need to help maximize their health,” says Giovanni Traverso, an associate professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, a gastroenterologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and an associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

Traverso is the senior author of the new study, which appears today in Nature Communications. Mehmet Girayhan Say, an MIT research scientist, and Sean You, a former MIT postdoc, are the lead authors of the paper.

A pill that communicates

Patients’ failure to take their medicine as prescribed is a major challenge that contributes to hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths and billions of dollars in health care costs annually.

To make it easier for people to take their medication, Traverso’s lab has worked on delivery capsules that can remain in the digestive tract for days or weeks, releasing doses at predetermined times. However, this approach may not be compatible with all drugs.

“We’ve developed systems that can stay in the body for a long time, and we know that those systems can improve adherence, but we also recognize that for certain medications, we can’t change the pill,” Traverso says. “The question becomes: What else can we do to help the person and help their health care providers ensure that they’re receiving the medication?”

In their new study, the researchers focused on a strategy that would allow doctors to more closely monitor whether patients are taking their medication. Using radio frequency — a type of signal that can be easily detected from outside the body and is safe for humans — they designed a capsule that can communicate after the patient has swallowed it.

There have been previous efforts to develop RF-based signaling devices for medication capsules, but those were all made from components that don’t break down easily in the body and would need to travel through the digestive system.

To minimize the potential risk of any blockage of the GI tract, the MIT team decided to create an RF-based system that would be bioresorbable, meaning that it can be broken down and absorbed by the body. The antenna that sends out the RF signal is made from zinc, and it is embedded into a cellulose particle.

“We chose these materials recognizing their very favorable safety profiles and also environmental compatibility,” Traverso says.

The zinc-cellulose antenna is rolled up and placed inside a capsule along with the drug to be delivered. The outer layer of the capsule is made from gelatin coated with a layer of cellulose and either molybdenum or tungsten, which blocks any RF signal from being emitted.

Once the capsule is swallowed, the coating breaks down, releasing the drug along with the RF antenna. The antenna can then pick up an RF signal sent from an external receiver and, working with a small RF chip, sends back a signal to confirm that the capsule was swallowed. This communication happens within 10 minutes of the pill being swallowed.

The RF chip, which is about 400 by 400 micrometers, is an off-the-shelf chip that is not biodegradable and would need to be excreted through the digestive tract. All of the other components would break down in the stomach within a week.

“The components are designed to break down over days using materials with well-established safety profiles, such as zinc and cellulose, which are already widely used in medicine,” Say says. “Our goal is to avoid long-term accumulation while enabling reliable confirmation that a pill was taken, and longer-term safety will continue to be evaluated as the technology moves toward clinical use.”

Promoting adherence

Tests in an animal model showed that the RF signal was successfully transmitted from inside the stomach and could be read by an external receiver at a distance up to 2 feet away. If developed for use in humans, the researchers envision designing a wearable device that could receive the signal and then transmit it to the patient’s health care team.

The researchers now plan to do further preclinical studies and hope to soon test the system in humans. One patient population that could benefit greatly from this type of monitoring is people who have recently had organ transplants and need to take immunosuppressant drugs to make sure their body doesn’t reject the new organ.

“We want to prioritize medications that, when non-adherence is present, could have a really detrimental effect for the individual,” Traverso says.

Other populations that could benefit include people who have recently had a stent inserted and need to take medication to help prevent blockage of the stent, people with chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, and people with neuropsychiatric disorders whose conditions may impair their ability to take their medication.

The research was funded by Novo Nordisk, MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Division of Gastroenterology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the U.S. Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), which notes that the views and conclusions contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the United States Government.

This work was carried out, in part, through the use of MIT.nano’s facilities.

For decades, scientists with big questions about biology have found answers in a tiny worm. That worm — a millimeter-long creature called Caenorhabditis elegans — has helped researchers uncover fundamental features of how cells and organisms work. The impact of that work is enormous: Discoveries made using C. elegans have been recognized with four Nobel Prizes and have led to the development of new treatments for human disease.

In a perspective piece published in the November 2025 issue of the journal PNAS, 11 biologists including Robert Horvitz, the David H. Koch (1962) Professor of Biology at MIT, celebrate Nobel Prize-winning advances made through research in C. elegans. The authors discuss how that work has led to advances for human health, and highlight how a uniquely collaborative community among worm researchers has fueled the field.

MIT scientists are well represented in that community: The prominent worm biologists who coauthored the PNAS paper include former MIT graduate students Andrew Fire PhD ’83 and Paul Sternberg PhD ’84, now at Stanford University and Caltech, respectively; and two past members of Horvitz’s lab, Victor Ambros ’75, PhD ’79, who is now at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, and former postdoc Gary Ruvkun of Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Rougvie at the University of Minnesota is the paper’s corresponding author.

“This tiny worm is beautiful — elegant both in its appearance and in its many contributions to our understanding of the biological universe in which we live,” says Horvitz, who in 2002 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, along with colleagues Sydney Brenner and John Sulston, for discoveries that helped explain how genes regulate programmed cell death and organ development. 

Early worm discoveries

Those discoveries were among the early successes in C. elegans research, made by pioneering scientists who recognized the power of the microscopic roundworm. C. elegans offers many advantages for researchers: The worms are easy to grow and maintain in labs; their transparent bodies make cells and internal processes readily visible under a microscope; they are cellularly very simple (e.g., they have only 302 nerve cells, compared with about 100 billion in a human) and their genomes can be readily manipulated to study gene function.

Most importantly, many of the molecules and processes that operate in C. elegans have been retained throughout evolution, meaning discoveries made using the worm can have direct relevance to other organisms, including humans. 

“Many aspects of biology are ancient and evolutionarily conserved,” Horvitz, who is also a member of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research and Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, as well as an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “Such shared mechanisms can be most readily revealed by analyzing organisms that are highly tractable in the laboratory.”

In the 1960s, Brenner, a molecular biologist who was curious about how animals’ nervous systems develop and function, recognized that C. elegans offered unique opportunities to study these processes. Once he began developing the worm into a model for laboratory studies, it did not take long for other biologists to join him to take advantage of the new system.

In the 1970s, the unique features of the worm allowed Sulston to track the transformation of a fertilized egg into an adult animal, tracing the origins of each of the adult worm’s 959 cells. His studies revealed that in every developing worm, cells divide and mature in predictable ways. He also learned that some of the cells created during development do not survive into adulthood, and are instead eliminated by a process termed programmed cell death.

By seeking mutations that perturbed the process of programmed cell death, Horvitz and his colleagues identified key regulators of that process, which is sometimes referred to as apoptosis. These regulators, which both promote and oppose apoptosis, turned out to be vital for programmed cell death across the animal kingdom.

In humans, apoptosis shapes developing organs, refines brain circuits, and optimizes other tissue structures. It also modulates our immune systems and eliminates cells that are in danger of becoming cancerous. The human version of CED-9, the anti-apoptotic regulator that Horvitz’s team discovered in worms, is BCL-2. Researchers have shown that activating apoptotic cell death by blocking BCL-2 is an effective treatment for certain blood cancers. Today, researchers are also exploring new ways of treating immune disorders and neurodegenerative disease by manipulating apoptosis pathways.

Collaborative worm community

Horvitz and his colleagues’ discoveries about apoptosis helped demonstrate that understanding C. elegans biology has direct relevance to human biology and disease. Since then, a vibrant and closely connected community of worm biologists — including many who trained in Horvitz’s lab — has continued to carry out impactful work. In their PNAS article, Horvitz and his coauthors highlight that early work, as well as the Nobel Prize-winning work of:

• Andrew Fire and Craig Mello, whose discovery of an RNA-based system of gene silencing led to powerful new tools to manipulate gene activity. The innate process they discovered in worms, known as RNA interference, is now used as the basis of six FDA-approved therapeutics for genetic disorders, silencing faulty genes to stop their harmful effects.
• Martin Chalfie, who used a fluorescent protein made by jellyfish to visualize and track specific cells in C. elegans, helping launch the development of a set of tools that transformed biologists’ ability to observe molecules and processes that are important for both health and disease.
• Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun, who discovered a class of molecules called microRNAs that regulate gene activity not just in worms, but in all multicellular organisms. This prize-winning work was started when Ambros and Ruvkun were postdocs in Horvitz’s lab. Humans rely on more than 1,000 microRNAs to ensure our genes are used at the right times and places. Disruptions to microRNAs have been linked to neurological disorders, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and autoimmune disease, and researchers are now exploring how these small molecules might be used for diagnosis or treatment.

Horvitz and his coauthors stress that while the worm itself made these discoveries possible, so too did a host of resources that facilitate collaboration within the worm community and enable its scientists to build upon the work of others. Scientists who study C. elegans have embraced this open, collaborative spirit since the field’s earliest days, Horvitz says, citing the Worm Breeder’s Gazette, an early newsletter where scientists shared their observations, methods, and ideas.

Today, scientists who study C. elegans — whether the organism is the centerpiece of their lab or they are looking to supplement studies of other systems — contribute to and rely on online resources like WormAtlas and WormBase, as well as the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, to share data and genetic tools. Horvitz says these resources have been crucial to his own lab’s work; his team uses them every day.

Just as molecules and processes discovered in C. elegans have pointed researchers toward important pathways in human cells, the worm has also been a vital proving ground for developing methods and approaches later deployed to study more complex organisms. For example, C. elegans, with its 302 neurons, was the first animal for which neuroscientists successfully mapped all of the connections of the nervous system. The resulting wiring diagram, or connectome, has guided countless experiments exploring how neurons work together to process information and control behavior. Informed by both the power and limitations of the C. elegans’ connectome, scientists are now mapping more complex circuitry, such as the 139,000-neuron brain of the fruit fly, whose connectome was completed in 2024.

C. elegans remains a mainstay of biological research, including in neuroscience. Scientists worldwide are using the worm to explore new questions about neural circuits, neurodegeneration, development, and disease. Horvitz’s lab continues to turn to C. elegans to investigate the genes that control animal development and behavior. His team is now using the worm to explore how animals develop a sense of time and transmit that information to their offspring.

Also at MIT, Steven Flavell’s team in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory is using the worm to investigate how neural connectivity, activity, and modulation integrate internal states, such as hunger, with sensory information, such as the smell of food, to produce sometimes long-lasting behaviors. (Flavell is Horvitz’s academic grandson, as Flavell trained with one of Horvitz’s postdoctoral trainees.)

As new technologies accelerate the pace of scientific discovery, Horvitz and his colleagues are confident that the humble worm will bring more unexpected insights.

The James M. and Cathleen D. Stone Center on Inequality and Shaping the Future of Work officially launched on Nov. 3, 2025, bringing together scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore critical questions about economic opportunity, technology, and democracy.

Co-directed by MIT professors Daron Acemoglu, David Autor, and Simon Johnson, the new Stone Center analyzes the forces that contribute to growing income and wealth inequality through the erosion of job quality and labor market opportunities for workers without a college degree. The center identifies innovative ways to move the economy onto a more equitable trajectory.

MIT Provost Anantha Chandrakasan opened the launch event by emphasizing the urgency and importance of the center's mission. “As artificial intelligence tools become more powerful, and as they are deployed more broadly,” he said, “we will need to strive to ensure that people from all kinds of backgrounds can find opportunity in the economy.”

Here are some of the key takeaways from participants in the afternoon’s discussions on wealth inequality, liberalism, and pro-worker AI.

Wealth inequality is driven by private business and public policy

Owen Zidar of Princeton University stressed that owners of businesses like car dealerships, construction firms, and franchises make up a significant portion of the top 1 percent. “For every public company CEO that gets a lot of attention,” he explained, “there are a thousand private business owners who have at least $25 million in wealth.” These business owners have outsized political influence through overrepresentation, lobbying, and donations.

Atif Mian of Princeton University connected high inequality to the U.S. debt crisis, arguing that massive savings at the top aren’t being channeled into productive investment. Instead, falling interest rates push the government to run increasingly large fiscal deficits.

To mitigate wealth inequality, speakers highlighted policy proposals including rolling back the 20 percent deduction for private business owners and increasing taxes on wealth.

However, policies must be carefully designed. Antoinette Schoar of the MIT Sloan School of Management explained how mortgage subsidy policies after the 2008 financial crisis actually worsened inequality by disadvantaging poorer potential homeowners.

Governments must provide basic public goods and economic security

Marc Dunkelman of the Watson School of International and Public Affairs at Brown University identified excessive red tape as a key problem for modern liberal democracy. “We can’t build high-speed rail. You can’t build enough housing,” he explained. “That spurs ordinary people who want government to work into the populist camp. We did this to ourselves.”

Josh Cohen of Apple University/the University of California at Berkeley emphasized that liberalism must deliver shared prosperity and fair opportunities, not just protect individual freedoms. When people lack economic security, they may turn to leaders who abandon liberal principles altogether.

Liberal democracy needs to adapt while keeping its core values

Helena Rosenblatt Dhar of the City University of New York Graduate Center noted that liberalism and democracy have not always been allies. Historically, “civil equality was very important, but not political equality,” she said. “Liberals were very wary of the masses.”

Speakers emphasized that liberalism’s challenge today is maintaining its commitments to limiting authoritarian power and protecting fundamental freedoms, while addressing its failures.

Doing so, in Dunkelman’s view, would mean working to “eliminate the sowing [of] the seeds of populism by making government properly balance individual rights and the will of the many.”

People-centric politics requires regulating social media

In his keynote at the launch, U.S. Representative Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts 4th District) connected these notions of government effectiveness and public trust to the influence of technology. He emphasized the need to regulate social media platforms.

“In my opinion, media is upstream of culture, which is upstream of politics,” he said. “If we want a better culture, and certainly if we want a better politics, we need a better media.”

Auchincloss proposed that regulation should include holding social media companies liable for content and banning targeted advertising to minors.

He also echoed the urgency and importance of the center’s research agenda, particularly to understand whether AI will augment or replace labor.

“My bias has always been: Technology creates more jobs,” he said. “Maybe it’s different this time. Maybe I’m wrong.”

Augmentation is key to pro-worker AI — but it may require alternative AI architectures

Stone Center co-director Daron Acemoglu argued that expanding what humans can do, rather than automating their tasks, is essential for achieving pro-worker AI.

However, Acemoglu cautioned that this won’t happen by itself, noting that the business models of tech companies and their focus on artificial general intelligence are not aligned with a pro-worker vision for AI. This vision may require public investment in alternative AI architectures focused on “domain-specific, reliable knowledge.”

Ethan Mollick of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania noted that AI labs are explicitly trying to “replace people at everything” and are “absolutely convinced that they can do this in the very near term.”

Meanwhile, companies have “no model for AI adoption,” Mollick explained. “There is absolute confusion.” Even so, “there’s enough money at stake [that] the machine keeps moving forward,” underscoring the urgency of intervention.

In a glimpse of what such intervention could look like, Zana Buçinca of Microsoft shared research findings that accounting for workers’ values and cognition in AI design can enable better complementarity.

“The impact of AI on human work is not destiny,” she emphasized. “It’s design.”

When the MIT Human Insight Collaborative (MITHIC) launched in fall 2024, it was designed to elevate scholars at the frontiers of human-centered research and education, and to provide them with resources to pursue their most innovative and ambitious ideas. 

At the inaugural MITHIC Annual Event on Nov. 17, 2025, faculty from across the Institute shared the progress and impact of the projects they’ve advanced this past year with support from the presidential initiative. 

In opening remarks, MIT President Sally Kornbluth noted the “incredible range of opportunities for faculty and students to ask new questions and arrive at better, bolder, and more nuanced answers, grounded in the wisdom of the humanities, arts, and social sciences,” that MITHIC has sparked in its first year. 

Kornbluth highlighted the Living Climate Futures Lab as an example of the kind of work MITHIC was designed to support. “The lab works with people in communities from Massachusetts to Mongolia who are grappling with the impacts of climate change on their daily lives — on health and food security, housing, and jobs,” she said. The initiative, which was the focus of a panel discussion during the event, received MITHIC’s inaugural Faculty-Driven Initiative (FDI) seed grant.

“Like all the projects that MITHIC supports, the Living Climate Futures Lab also embodies MIT’s singular brand of excellence: collaborative, hands-on, and is deeply relevant to the world and the people around us,” added Kornbluth. 

MIT Provost Anantha Chandrakasan welcomed the audience, noting that “MITHIC is off to a strong start, advancing work across the Institute that broadens our perspective on global challenges.

“MITHIC is about inspiring our community to think differently and work together in new ways. It is about embedding human-centered thinking throughout our research, innovation, and education,” added Chandrakasan, who serves as co-chair of MITHIC.

Keynote speaker Rick Locke, the John C. Head III Dean of the MIT Sloan School of Management, spoke to the “Human Side of Enterprise,” zeroing in on the challenges and opportunities that will determine the future of management education — and how MIT Sloan can position itself at the forefront. In practice, that means the work of MIT Sloan and MITHIC can shape how new technologies like artificial intelligence will reconfigure industries and careers. 

Of equal importance, Locke said, will be how new enterprises are created and run, how people work and live, how business practices become more sustainable, and how national economies develop and adapt.

“MIT has a history of charting and paving pathways to an exciting and productive future of work that not only includes humans, but makes the most of our humanity. Together we can invent this future,” said Locke, who earned his doctorate in MIT’s Department of Political Science and later served as head of the department.

After his address, Locke joined Agustín Rayo, the Kenan Sahin Dean of the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences and co-chair of MITHIC, for a fireside chat.

Bringing the classics back to life

In a session exploring innovations in MIT education, Kieran Setiya, the Peter de Florez Professor of Philosophy, detailed what he and his colleagues are calling a “Great Books” initiative. 

As part of a three-year pilot, faculty in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy have developed a two-semester sequence that focuses on books that reward repeated reading. The courses are loosely integrated and offered as electives, filling what Setiya calls an “urgent need for students to grapple with expansive questions about human nature, human knowledge, ethics, society, and politics” at a time of rapid social and technological change.

As students explore the work of authors like Plato and Aristotle, Homer and Virgil, Virginia Woolf, W.E.B. DuBois, and Simone de Beauvoir, they develop a deeper understanding of history, culture, and social change. These attributes, Setiya says, “will make students better people and better citizens. We're not just preparing MIT students to land high-paying jobs, but to solve human problems and to make the world a better place.”

AI and its impact

During a session on the use of AI, Esther Duflo, the Abdul Latif Jameel Professor of Poverty Alleviation and Development Economics, shared research she is working on in India with co-project lead Marzyeh Ghassemi, associate professor and the Germeshausen Career Development Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). 

Duflo explained that the team is using AI to identify undiagnosed “silent” heart attacks, aiming to improve diagnosis and treatment of heart disease, the country’s No. 1 cause of death. The research team harnessed the power of a cheap diagnostic tool — a handheld electrocardiogram (ECG) device — to collect data on 6,000 patients who visited local health camps to predict their risk of a heart attack. 

They then paired the initial data with follow-up data from a cardiac ultrasound, which was able to confirm if patients experienced one. The researchers used this paired data and their own novel algorithm to train the ECG devices to more accurately assess a patient’s risk. The results are encouraging: 

“What is remarkable compared to existing tests is that it catches young people who are less likely to have had a silent heart attack, but still have a high risk. Right now, those young people are completely excluded from the current screening, because it’s basically based only on age,” Duflo said.

Reconstructing the music of the past

The day also featured a musical demonstration using three different replicas of an ancient Paracas whistle that a team from MIT recreated in collaboration with the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (MFA).

It was a practical example of how Mark Rau, an assistant professor in music and theater arts with a shared appointment in EECS, and Benjamin Sabatini, a senior postdoc in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, are using CT scan technology to create models of ancient instruments, measure their vibrations and acoustic parameters, and produce functional reproductions. 

The team offered a step-by-step overview of the process they’ve used to assess the instruments and create the 3D-printed plaster molds, working alongside Jared Katz, the Pappalardo Curator of Musical Instruments at the MFA, resulting in a playable replica of an instrument used centuries ago. 

“What we’re really excited about is getting these kinds of replicas in the hands of students and musicians, and having experimental engagements. We’re also really excited about the printed replicas that allow the collection to be activated in new ways,” Katz explained.

The event featured Q&A opportunities throughout the day, as well as a reception at the close of the day. MITHIC’s second call for proposals this fall yielded nearly 80 submissions, which are under review for funding in 2026. 

A new call for proposals for the SHASS+ Connectivity Fund will be held in spring 2026. SHASS+ supports projects led by a SHASS scholar and a collaborator from another part of the Institute. Another call for proposals for the next FDI seed grant will also take place in spring 2026. 

Waiting in an airport for a connecting flight is often tedious. A new study by MIT researchers shows it’s bad for business, too.

Looking at air travel and multinational firm formation over a 30-year period, the researchers measured how much a strong network of airline connections matters for economic growth. They found that multinational firms are more likely to locate their subsidiaries in cities they can reach with direct flights, and that this trend is particularly pronounced in knowledge industries. The degree to which a city is embedded within a larger network of high-use flights matters notably for business expansion too.

The team examined 142 countries over the period from 1993 through 2023 and concluded that pairs of cities reachable only by flights with one stopover had 20 percent fewer multinational firm subsidiaries than cities with direct flights. If two changes of planes were needed to connect cities, they had 34 percent fewer subsidiaries. That equates to 1.8 percent and 3.0 percent fewer new firms per year, respectively.

“What we found is how much it matters for a city to be embedded within the global air transportation network,” says Ambra Amico, an MIT researcher and co-author of a new paper detailing the study’s results. “And we also highlight the importance of this for knowledge-intensive business sectors.”

Siqi Zheng, an MIT professor and co-author of the paper, adds: “We found a very strong empirical result about the relationship of parent and subsidiary firms, and how much connectivity matters. The important role that connectivity plays to facilitate face-to-face interactions, build trust, and reduce information asymmetry between such firms is crucial.”

The paper, “Air Connectivity Boosts Urban Attractiveness for Global Firms,” is published today in Nature Cities.

The co-authors are Amico, a postdoc at the MIT-Singapore Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART); Fabio Duarte, associate director of MIT’s Senseable City Lab; Wen-Chi Liao, a visiting associate professor at the MIT Center for Real Estate (CRE) and an associate professor at NUS Business School at the National University of Singapore; and Zheng, the STL Champion Professor of Urban and Real Estate Sustainability at CRE and MIT’s Department of Urban Studies and Planning.

The study analyzes 7.5 million firms in 800 cities with airports, comprising a total of over 400,000 international flight routes. The research focused only on multinational firms, and thus international flights, excluding domestic flights in large countries.

To conduct the analysis and build their new database, the researchers used flight data from the International Civil Aviation Organization as well as firm data from the Orbis database, run by Moody’s, which has company data for over 469 million firms globally. That includes ownership data, allowing the researchers to track relationships between companies. The study included firms located within 37 miles (60 kilometers) of an airport, and accounted for additional factors influencing new-firm location, including city size.

By analyzing industry types, the researchers observed that air connectivity matters relatively more in knowledge industries, such as finance, where face-to-face activity seems to matter more. Alternately, a knowledge-industry firm with auditors periodically showing up to conduct work can lower costs by being more reachable.

“We were fascinated by the heterogenity across industries,” Liao says. “The results are intuitive, but it surprised us that the pattern is so consistent. If the nature of the industy requires face-to-face interaction, air connectivity matters more.” By contrast, for manufacturing, he notes, road infrastructure and ocean shipping will matter relatively more.

To be sure, there are multiple ways to define how connected a city is within the global air transportation network, and the study examines how specific measures relate to firm growth. One measure is what the paper calls “degree centrality,” or how many other places a city is connected to by direct flights. Over a 10-year period, a 10 percent increase in a city’s degree centrality leads to a 4.3 percent increase in the number of subsidiaries located there.

However, another kind of connectedness is even more strongly associated with subsidiary growth. It’s not just how many cities one place is linked to, but in turn, how many direct connections those linked cities themselves have. This turns out to be the strongest predictor of subsidiary growth.

“What matters is not just how many neighbor [directly linked] cities you have,” Duarte says. “It’s important to choose strategically which ones you’re connected to, as well. If you tell me who you are connected to, I tell you how successful your city will be.”

Intriguingly, the relationship between direct flights and multinational firm growth patterns has held up throughout the 30-year study period, despite the rise of teleconferencing, the Covid-19 pandemic, shifts in global growth, and other factors.

“There is consistency across a 30-year period, which is not something to underestimate,” Amico says. “We needed face-to-face interaction 30 years ago, 20 years ago, and 10 years ago, and we need it now, despite all the big changes we have seen.”

Indeed, Zheng adds, “Ironically, I think even with trade and geopolitical frictions, it’s more and more important to have face-to-face interactions to build trust for global trade and business. You still need to reach an actual place and see your business partners, so air connectivity really influences how global business copes with global uncertainties.”

The research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Singapore within the Office of the Prime Minister of Singapore, under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise program, and the MIT Asia Real Estate Initiative. 

Can an organization ever be truly meritocratic? That’s a question Emilio J. Castilla, the NTU Professor of Management at the MIT Sloan School of Management, explores in his new book, “The Meritocracy Paradox: Where Talent Management Strategies Go Wrong and How to Fix Them” (Columbia University Press, 2025). Castilla, who is co-director of MIT’s Institute for Work and Employment Research (IWER), researches how talent is managed inside organizations and why — even with the best intentions — workplace practices often fail to deliver fairness and effectiveness.

Castilla’s book brings together decades of research to explain why organizations struggle to achieve meritocracy in practice — and what leaders can do to build fairer, more effective, and higher-performing workplaces. In the following Q&A, he unpacks how bias can unintentionally seep into hiring, evaluation, promotion, and reward systems, and offers concrete strategies to counteract these dynamics and design processes that recognize and support merit.

Q: One central argument of your book is that true meritocracy is not easy for organizations to achieve in practice. Why is that? 

A. A large body of research has found that bias and unfairness can creep into the workplace, affecting talent management processes such as who gets interviewed for jobs, who gets hired, what kind of performance evaluations employees receive, and how employees are rewarded. So it’s not easy for an organization to be truly meritocratic.

In fact, research I conducted with Stephen Benard found that, ironically, emphasizing that an organization is a meritocracy may lead decision-makers to behave in more biased ways. Specifically, in our study, we found that when participants were told they were making decisions for an organization that emphasized meritocracy, they were more likely to recommend higher bonuses for male employees than for their equally-performing female peers, compared to when meritocracy wasn’t emphasized. We called this phenomenon the “paradox of meritocracy,” and it may stem from managers paying less attention to monitoring their own biases when they are assured the organization is fair.

A study I conducted with Aruna Ranganathan PhD ’14 further showed that managers’ understanding of what constitutes “merit” varies widely — even within the same organization. There is no universally agreed-upon definition, and our research found that managers often apply the concept of merit in ways that reflect their own experiences as employees. This variability can lead to inconsistent, and sometimes inequitable, outcomes.

Q. What are some of the things organizations can do to make their talent management practices more meritocratic?

A. The encouraging news is that making your organization’s talent management processes fairer and more meritocratic doesn’t have to be complex or expensive. It does, however, require buy-in from top management. The key factors, my research in organizations has shown, are organizational transparency and accountability.

To improve organizational transparency, you need to be very explicit and open about the criteria and procedures you use in talent management processes such as hiring, evaluation, promotion, and reward decisions. That’s because research has shown that having clear and specific merit-based criteria and well-defined processes can help reduce biases.

On the accountability side, you need to have at least one person responsible for monitoring the organization’s talent management processes and outcomes to ensure fairness and effectiveness. In practice, companies often give this responsibility to a group from different parts of the organization. Research has shown that knowing that your decisions will be reviewed by others causes managers to think carefully about their decisions — something that can reduce the impact of unconscious biases in the workplace.

Q. How realistic is it to think that organizations can ever be true meritocracies — and why do you nonetheless believe meritocracy is worth striving for?

A. It’s true that organizations are unlikely to ever be perfectly meritocratic. Still, striving for meritocracy and fairness in your talent management strategies is beneficial, and you should be aware of the pitfalls. Employers that hire, reward, and advance the most talented and hard-working employees, regardless of their demographic background, are likely to benefit in the long run. That’s the promise and enduring appeal of meritocracy.

Many in the United States may not realize that one of the world’s earliest formal meritocracies emerged in China during the Han and Qin dynasties more than 2,000 years ago. As early as 200 B.C.E., the Chinese empire began developing a system of civil service exams in order to identify and appoint competent and talented officials to help administer government operations throughout the empire.

Those Chinese emperors were on to something. Once an organization reaches a certain size, leaders won’t achieve the most effective performance if they make talent management decisions based on non-meritocratic factors such as nepotism, aristocracy/social class, corruption, or friendship. When it comes to choosing a guiding principle for people management decisions within an organization, meritocracy beats a lot of the alternatives.

Massachusetts is uniquely positioned to become a leader in climate tech, said Emily Reichert MBA ’12, the CEO of the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center (MassCEC) and former CEO of Greentown Labs, to members of the MIT community at a seminar in November. 

Reichert outlined the interconnectedness of economic development and clean energy innovation in MassCEC’s efforts to advance the energy transition and address climate change, as part of the MITEI Presents: Advancing the Energy Transition speaker series. An MIT Sloan School of Management alumna, Reichert stepped aside as the agency’s CEO in late November and the MITEI speaker series was her final presentation in that role.

“There’s not another [agency] in the country exactly like us focused on innovation and economic development for clean energy and climate tech,” stated Reichert. Created in 2008, MassCEC is the state’s economic development agency dedicated to the growth of the clean energy and climate tech sector. Reichert stressed that economic development is just as much about businesses as it is about the jobs they create.

The organization’s economic development plan is built on its knowledge of the commonwealth’s infrastructure, talent capabilities, academic resources, startup culture, and regional strengths. Reichert explained that there are four areas at the core of MassCEC’s work.

First, bringing emerging climate-tech ideas out of the laboratory and into the world. To do this, MassCEC provides grants, internships, and has a small investment fund that is co-invested with different investors in the area. “We are increasingly focusing on the longer-term growth trajectory of these young companies,” said Reichert, adding that the hope is for these startups to stay, grow, and create jobs in Massachusetts.

Second, MassCEC aims to accelerate decarbonization by taking commercialized technologies and helping to get them into as many homes and businesses as possible. This can often require specialized knowledge of Massachusetts’ infrastructure, given that the state has relatively older buildings and unique structures, such as triple-deckers. One example is finding a way to make charging technology available to electric vehicle owners when they don’t have a single-family home with a garage.

MassCEC is also focused on enabling the large-scale deployment of offshore wind. “It’ll be 400,000 homes that are powered by the clean energy that’s being generated by offshore wind right off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard. MassCEC’s role is to support the port infrastructure from which we marshal those offshore wind projects,” stated Reichert. “We also support innovation that is needed to do all the things that support the offshore wind industry, in general.”

Finally, Reichert reiterated that MassCEC’s overarching goal is to support clean energy workforce development through job creation, as well as professional development opportunities such as providing internships, training for high school and community college students, and supporting students returning to school for a second career in clean energy.

Reichert emphasized that Massachusetts is particularly well-equipped to house this level of climate-tech innovation since the state is already a leader in the life sciences. The Healey-Driscoll administration charged MassCEC with spearheading the state’s Climatetech Economic Development Strategy and Implementation Plan, a 10-year strategy to position Massachusetts as a global climate tech leader and drive a more equitable and resilient climate future.

To complement this plan and further position the state as an epicenter for energy innovation, the Healey-Driscoll administration also passed the Mass Leads Act, which established the Climatetech Tax Incentive Program, an annual tax incentive to be administered by MassCEC. “This is the money piece,” said Reichert. “How we do it. How we implement it.”

To unlock Massachusetts’ full potential, MassCEC uses a regional approach to take advantage of the strengths held in each area of the state. “We have a fantastic ecosystem. We have more startups per capita than any other state,” said Reichert. The quantity of startups is in large part due to the strengths of the Greater Boston region, with its strong venture capital community and good research institutions, said Reichert, who also highlighted MIT as a key factor. MIT spinout companies like Sublime Systems, Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Boston Metal, and The Engine are all part of MassCEC’s ecosystem.

For the agency, retaining talent in Massachusetts is just as important as supporting its development. “How can we help companies to do their processes, find their facilities, build their facilities, do their demonstrations, do their testing, and find the talent?” asked Reichert. “How can we reduce the time and money barriers to all of that, and therefore make it as easy as possible and as inexpensive as possible for the company to stay here and grow here?”

Reichert expressed her confidence in climate-tech innovation’s ability to endure the changing energy landscape. “The rest of the world is going in this direction. We can decide not to compete as a country, or we can decide that we want to compete and that we want to be part of the future,” said Reichert. “Innovation isn’t going anywhere. I think when you have places like MIT, who are very focused on climate innovation and the energy transition, that activity helps move the ball forward.”

This speaker series highlights energy experts and leaders at the forefront of the scientific, technological, and policy solutions needed to transform our energy systems. Visit MITEI’s Events page for more information on this and additional events.