Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing titled “Defending Against Drones: Setting Safeguards for Counter Unmanned Aircraft Systems Authorities.” While the government has a legitimate interest in monitoring and mitigating drone threats, it is critical that those powers are narrowly tailored. Robust checks and oversight mechanisms must exist to prevent misuse and to allow ordinary, law-abiding individuals to exercise their rights. 

Unfortunately, as we and many other civil society advocates have highlighted, past proposals have not addressed those needs. Congress should produce well-balanced rules that address all these priorities, not grant de facto authority to law enforcement to take down drone flights whenever they want. Ultimately, Congress must decide whether drones will be a technology that mainly serves government agencies and big companies, or whether it might also empower individuals. 

To make meaningful progress in stabilizing counter unmanned aerial system (“C-UAS”) authorities and addressing emerging issues, Congress should adopt a more comprehensive approach that considers the full range of risks and implements proper safeguards. Future C-UAS legislation include the following priorities, which are essential to protecting civil liberties and ensuring accountability:

• Strong and explicit safeguards for First Amendment-protected activities 
• Ensure transparency and require detailed reporting
• Provide due process and recourse for improper counter-drone activities 
• Require C-UAS mitigation to involve least-invasive methods
• Maintain reasonable retention limits on data collection
• Maintain sunset for C-UAS powers as drone uses continue to evolve

Congress can—and should—address public safety concerns without compromising privacy and civil liberties. C-UAS authorities should only be granted with the clear limits outlined above to help ensure that counter-drone authorities are wielded responsibly.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) shared these concerns with the Committee in a joint Statement For The Record.

Life is a little brighter in Kapiyo these days.

For many in this rural Kenyan town, nightfall used to signal the end to schoolwork and other family activities. Now, however, the darkness is pierced by electric lights from newly solar-powered homes. Inside, children in this off-the-grid area can study while parents extend daily activities past dusk, thanks to a project conceived by an MIT mechanical engineering student and financed by the MIT African Students Association (ASA) Impact Fund.

There are changes coming, too, in the farmlands of Kashusha in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where another ASA Impact Fund project is working with local growers to establish an energy-efficient mill for processing corn — adding value, creating jobs, and sparking new economic opportunities. Similarly, plans are underway to automate processing of locally-grown cashews in the Mtwara area of Tanzania — an Impact Fund project meant to increase the income of farmers who now send over 90 percent of their nuts abroad for processing.

Inspired by a desire by MIT students to turn promising ideas into practical solutions for people in their home countries, the ASA Impact Fund is a student-run initiative that launched during the 2023-24 academic year. Backed by an alumni board, the fund empowers students to conceive, design, and lead projects with social and economic impact in communities across Africa.

After financing three projects its first year, the ASA Impact Fund received eight project proposals earlier this year and plans to announce its second round of two to four grants sometime this spring, says Pamela Abede, last year’s fund president. Last year’s awards totaled approximately $15,000.

The fund is an outgrowth of MIT’s African Learning Circle, a seminar open to the entire MIT community where biweekly discussions focus on ways to apply MIT’s educational resources, entrepreneurial spirit, and innovation to improve lives on the African continent.

“The Impact Fund was created,” says MIT African Students Association president Victory Yinka-Banjo, “to take this to the next level … to go from talking to execution.”

Aimed at bridging a gap between projects Learning Circle participants envision and resources available to fund them, the ASA Impact Fund “exists as an avenue to assist our members in undertaking social impact projects on the African continent,” the initiative’s website states, “thereby combining theoretical learning with practical application in alignment with MIT's motto.”

The fund’s value extends to the Cambridge campus as well, says ASA Impact Fund board member and 2021 MIT graduate Bolu Akinola.

“You can do cool projects anywhere,” says Akinola, who is originally from Nigeria and currently pursuing a master’s degree in business administration at Harvard University. “Where this is particularly catalyzing is in incentivizing folks to go back home and impact life back on the continent of Africa.”

MIT-Africa managing director Ari Jacobovits, who helped students get the fund off the ground last year, agrees.

“I think it galvanized the community, bringing people together to bridge a programmatic gap that had long felt like a missed opportunity,” Jacobovits says. “I’m always impressed by the level of service-mindedness ASA members have towards their home communities. It’s something we should all be celebrating and thinking about incorporating into our home communities, wherever they may be.”

Alumni Board president Selam Gano notes that a big part of the Impact Fund’s appeal is the close connections project applicants have with the communities they’re working with. MIT engineering major Shekina Pita, for example, is from Kapiyo, and recalls “what it was like growing up in a place with unreliable electricity,” which “would impact every aspect of my life and the lives of those that I lived around.” Pita’s personal experience and familiarity with the community informed her proposal to install solar panels on Kapiyo homes.

So far, the ASA Impact Fund has financed installation of solar panels for five households where families had been relying on candles so their children could do homework after dark.

“A candle is 15 Kenya shillings, and I don’t always have that amount to buy candles for my children to study. I am grateful for your help,” comments one beneficiary of the Kapiyo solar project.

Pita anticipates expanding the project, 10 homes at a time, and involving some college-age residents of those homes in solar panel installation apprenticeships.

“In general, we try to balance projects where we fund some things that are very concrete solutions to a particular community’s problems — like a water project or solar energy — and projects with a longer-term view that could become an organization or a business — like a novel cashew nut processing method,” says Gano, who conducted projects in his father’s homeland of Ethiopia while an MIT student. “I think striking that balance is something I am particularly proud of. We believe that people in the community know best what they need, and it’s great to empower students from those same communities.”  

Vivian Chinoda, who received a grant from the ASA Impact Fund and was part of the African Students Association board that founded it, agrees.

“We want to address problems that can seem trivial without the lived experience of them,” says Chinoda. “For my friend and I, getting funding to go to Tanzania and drive more than 10 hours to speak to remotely located small-scale cashew farmers … made a difference. We were able to conduct market research and cross-check our hypotheses on a project idea we brainstormed in our dorm room in ways we would not have otherwise been able to access remotely.”

Similarly, Florida Mahano’s Impact Fund-financed project is benefiting from her experience growing up near farms in the DRC. Partnering with her brother, a mechanical engineer in her home community of Bukavu in eastern DRC, Mahano is on her way to developing a processing plant that will serve the needs of local farmers. Informed by market research involving about 500 farmers, consumers, and retailers that took place in January, the plant will likely be operational by summer 2026, says Mahano, who has also received funding from MIT’s Priscilla King Gray (PKG) Public Service Center.

“The ASA Impact Fund was the starting point for us,” paving the way for additional support, she says. “I feel like the ASA Impact Fund was really amazing because it allowed me to bring my idea to life.”

Importantly, Chinoda notes that the Impact Fund has already had early success in fostering ties between undergraduate students and MIT alumni.

“When we sent out the application to set up the alumni board, we had a volume of respondents coming in quite quickly, and it was really encouraging to see how the alums were so willing to be present and use their skill sets and connections to build this from the ground up,” she says.

Abede, who is originally from Ghana, would like to see that enthusiasm continue — increasing alumni awareness about the fund “to get more alums involved … more alums on the board and mentoring the students.”

Mentoring is already an important aspect of the ASA Impact Fund, says Akinola. Grantees, she says, get paired with alumni to help them through the process of getting projects underway. 

“This fund could be a really good opportunity to strengthen the ties between the alumni community and current students,” Akinola says. “I think there are a lot of opportunities for funds like this to tap into the MIT alumni community. I think where there is real value is in the advisory nature — mentoring and coaching current students, helping the transfer of skills and resources.”

As more projects are proposed and funded each year, awareness of the ASA Impact Fund among MIT alumni will increase, Gano predicts.

“We’ve had just one year of grantees so far, and all of the projects they’ve conducted have been great,” he says. “I think even if we just continue functioning at this scale, if we’re able to sustain the fund, we can have a real lasting impact as students and alumni and build more and more partnerships on the continent.”

Behavioral economist Sendhil Mullainathan has never forgotten the pleasure he felt the first time he tasted a delicious crisp, yet gooey Levain cookie. He compares the experience to when he encounters new ideas.

“That hedonic pleasure is pretty much the same pleasure I get hearing a new idea, discovering a new way of looking at a situation, or thinking about something, getting stuck and then having a breakthrough. You get this kind of core basic reward,” says Mullainathan, the Peter de Florez Professor with dual appointments in the MIT departments of Economics and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and a principal investigator at the MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS).

Mullainathan’s love of new ideas, and by extension of going beyond the usual interpretation of a situation or problem by looking at it from many different angles, seems to have started very early. As a child in school, he says, the multiple-choice answers on tests all seemed to offer possibilities for being correct.

“They would say, ‘Here are three things. Which of these choices is the fourth?’ Well, I was like, ‘I don’t know.’ There are good explanations for all of them,” Mullainathan says. “While there’s a simple explanation that most people would pick, natively, I just saw things quite differently.”

Mullainathan says the way his mind works, and has always worked, is “out of phase” — that is, not in sync with how most people would readily pick the one correct answer on a test. He compares the way he thinks to “one of those videos where an army’s marching and one guy’s not in step, and everyone is thinking, what’s wrong with this guy?”

Luckily, Mullainathan says, “being out of phase is kind of helpful in research.”

And apparently so. Mullainathan has received a MacArthur “Genius Grant,” has been designated a “Young Global Leader” by the World Economic Forum, was named a “Top 100 thinker” by Foreign Policy magazine, was included in the “Smart List: 50 people who will change the world” by Wired magazine, and won the Infosys Prize, the largest monetary award in India recognizing excellence in science and research.

Another key aspect of who Mullainathan is as a researcher — his focus on financial scarcity — also dates back to his childhood. When he was about 10, just a few years after his family moved to the Los Angeles area from India, his father lost his job as an aerospace engineer because of a change in security clearance laws regarding immigrants. When his mother told him that without work, the family would have no money, he says he was incredulous.

“At first I thought, that can’t be right. It didn’t quite process,” he says. “So that was the first time I thought, there’s no floor. Anything can happen. It was the first time I really appreciated economic precarity.”

His family got by running a video store and then other small businesses, and Mullainathan made it to Cornell University, where he studied computer science, economics, and mathematics. Although he was doing a lot of math, he found himself drawn not to standard economics, but to the behavioral economics of an early pioneer in the field, Richard Thaler, who later won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his work. Behavioral economics brings the psychological, and often irrational, aspects of human behavior into the study of economic decision-making.

“It’s the non-math part of this field that’s fascinating,” says Mullainathan. “What makes it intriguing is that the math in economics isn’t working. The math is elegant, the theorems. But it’s not working because people are weird and complicated and interesting.”

Behavioral economics was so new as Mullainathan was graduating that he says Thaler advised him to study standard economics in graduate school and make a name for himself before concentrating on behavioral economics, “because it was so marginalized. It was considered super risky because it didn’t even fit a field,” Mullainathan says.

Unable to resist thinking about humanity’s quirks and complications, however, Mullainathan focused on behavioral economics, got his PhD at Harvard University, and says he then spent about 10 years studying people.

“I wanted to get the intuition that a good academic psychologist has about people. I was committed to understanding people,” he says.

As Mullainathan was formulating theories about why people make certain economic choices, he wanted to test these theories empirically.

In 2013, he published a paper in Science titled “Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function.” The research measured sugarcane farmers’ performance on intelligence tests in the days before their yearly harvest, when they were out of money, sometimes nearly to the point of starvation. In the controlled study, the same farmers took tests after their harvest was in and they had been paid for a successful crop — and they scored significantly higher.

Mullainathan says he is gratified that the research had far-reaching impact, and that those who make policy often take its premise into account.

“Policies as a whole are kind of hard to change,” he says, “but I do think it has created sensitivity at every level of the design process, that people realize that, for example, if I make a program for people living in economic precarity hard to sign up for, that’s really going to be a massive tax.”

To Mullainathan, the most important effect of the research was on individuals, an impact he saw in reader comments that appeared after the research was covered in The Guardian.

“Ninety percent of the people who wrote those comments said things like, ‘I was economically insecure at one point. This perfectly reflects what it felt like to be poor.’”

Such insights into the way outside influences affect personal lives could be among important advances made possible by algorithms, Mullainathan says.

“I think in the past era of science, science was done in big labs, and it was actioned into big things. I think the next age of science will be just as much about allowing individuals to rethink who they are and what their lives are like.”

Last year, Mullainathan came back to MIT (after having previously taught at MIT from 1998 to 2004) to focus on artificial intelligence and machine learning.

“I wanted to be in a place where I could have one foot in computer science and one foot in a top-notch behavioral economic department,” he says. “And really, if you just objectively said ‘what are the places that are A-plus in both,’ MIT is at the top of that list.”

While AI can automate tasks and systems, such automation of abilities humans already possess is “hard to get excited about,” he says. Computer science can be used to expand human abilities, a notion only limited by our creativity in asking questions.

“We should be asking, what capacity do you want expanded? How could we build an algorithm to help you expand that capacity? Computer science as a discipline has always been so fantastic at taking hard problems and building solutions,” he says. “If you have a capacity that you’d like to expand, that seems like a very hard computing challenge. Let’s figure out how to take that on.”

The sciences that “are very far from having hit the frontier that physics has hit,” like psychology and economics, could be on the verge of huge developments, Mullainathan says. “I fundamentally believe that the next generation of breakthroughs is going to come from the intersection of understanding of people and understanding of algorithms.”

He explains a possible use of AI in which a decision-maker, for example a judge or doctor, could have access to what their average decision would be related to a particular set of circumstances. Such an average would be potentially freer of day-to-day influences — such as a bad mood, indigestion, slow traffic on the way to work, or a fight with a spouse.

Mullainathan sums the idea up as “average-you is better than you. Imagine an algorithm that made it easy to see what you would normally do. And that’s not what you’re doing in the moment. You may have a good reason to be doing something different, but asking that question is immensely helpful.”

Going forward, Mullainathan will absolutely be trying to work toward such new ideas — because to him, they offer such a delicious reward.

In response to a FOIA request, the NSA released “Fifty Years of Mathematical Cryptanalysis (1937-1987),” by Glenn F. Stahly, with a lot of redactions.

Weirdly, this is the second time the NSA has declassified the document. John Young got a copy in 2019. This one has a few less redactions. And nothing that was provided in 2019 was redacted here.

If you find anything interesting in the document, please tell us about it in the comments.

The administration’s order that stopped work on the New York project served as a warning for the entire offshore wind industry in the U.S.

The dismissal is at least the fifth in the past year for lawsuits that seek compensation from oil and gas companies.

The $500 million investment by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. in a Texas direct air capture hub comes as President Donald Trump cancels climate funding.

The "Next Generation Act," a sprawling bill backed by the Legislature's top Democrats, is still awaiting action from Gov. Wes Moore.

Utilities, energy companies and the wireless industry were among the groups that called for strengthening the agency as President Donald Trump considers dismantling it.

The center-right party of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is shifting away from green issues as it aligns itself with farmers and industry.

At a closed-door meeting, the heads of the central banks and regulators rejected a proposal to dissolve the task force overseeing climate work.

The market “has reached an inflection point,” the company's managing director said.

On Wall Street, ESG is now effectively taboo, as the Trump administration mounts a full-throated attack on net-zero policies.

Around the world, low immunizations rates for children are a persistent problem. Now, an experiment conducted in India shows that an inexpensive combination of methods, including text reminders and small financial incentives, has a major impact on immunization.

Led by MIT economists, the research finds that a trifecta of incentives, text messages, and information provided by local residents creates a 44 percent increase in child immunizations, at low cost. Alternately, without financial incentives, but still using text messages and local information, there is a 9 percent increase in immunizations at virtually no expense — the most cost-effective increase the researchers found.

“The most effective package overall has incentives, reminders, and enlisting of community ambassadors to remind people,” says MIT economist Esther Duflo, who helped lead the research. “The cost is very low. And an even more cost-effective package is to not have incentives — you can increase immunization just from reminders through social networks. That’s basically a free lunch because you are making a more effective use of the immunization infrastructure in place. So the small cost of the program is more compensated by the fact that the full cost of administering an immunization goes down.”

The experiment is also notable for the sophisticated new method the research team developed to combine a variety of these approaches in the experiment — and then see precisely what effects were produced by different combinations as well as their component parts.

“What is good about this is that it triangulates and links all these pieces of evidence together,” says MIT economist Abhijit Banerjee, who also helped lead the project. “In terms of our confidence in saying this is a reasonable policy recipe, that’s very important.”

A new paper detailing the results and the method, “Selecting the Most Effective Nudge: Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment on Immunization,” is being published in the journal Econometrica. Duflo and Banerjee are among 11 co-authors of the paper, along with several staff members of MIT’s Abdul Latif Jameel Anti-Poverty Lab (J-PAL).

Duflo and Banerjee are also two of the co-founders of MIT’s Abdul Latif Jameel Anti-Poverty Lab (J-PAL), a global leader in field experiments about antipoverty programs. In 2019 they were awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, along with Michael Kremer of Harvard University.

Analyzing 75 approaches at once

About 2 million children die per year globally from diseases that are vaccine-preventable. As of 2016, when the current study began, only 62 percent of children in India were fully immunized against tuberculosis, measles, diptheria, tetanus, and polio.

Prior research by Duflo and Banerjee has helped validate the value of finding new ways to boost immunizations rates. In one prior study the economists found that immunization rates for rural children in the state of Rajasthan, India, jumped from 5 percent to 39 percent when their families were offered a modest quantity of lentils as an incentive. (That finding was mentioned in their Nobel citation.) Subsequently, many other researchers have studied new methods of increasing immunization.

To conduct the current study, the research team partnered with the state government of Haryana, India, to conduct an experiment spanning more than 900 villages, from 2016 through 2019.

The researchers based the experiment around their three basic ways of encouraging parents to get their children vaccinated: financial incentives, text messages, and information from local “ambassadors,” that is, well-connected residents. The research team then developed a set of varying combinations of these elements. In some cases they would offer more incentives, or fewer, along with different amounts of text messages, and different kinds of exposure to local information.

In all, the researchers wound up with 75 combinations of these elements and developed a new method to evaluate them all, which they call treatment variant aggregation (TVA). Essentially, the scholars developed an algorithm that used a systematic data-driven approach to pool together variations that were ultimately identical, and noted which ones were ineffective. To select the best package, they also adjusted their results for the so-called “winner’s curse” of social-science studies, in which the policy option that works best in a particular experiment will tend to be the one that did better due to random chance.

All told, the scholars believe they have developed a way of evaluating many “treatments” — the individual elements, such as financial incentives — within the same experiment, rather than just trying out one concept, like distributing lentils, per every large study.

“It’s not one experiment where you compare A with B,” says Banerjee, who is also the Ford Foundation International Professor of Economics. “What we do here is evaluate a combination of things. Even in scenarios where you see no effect, there is information to be harvested. It may be that in a combination of treatments, maybe one element works well, and the others have a negative effect and the net is zero, but there is information there. So, you want to keep track of all the possibilities as you go along, although it is a mathematically difficult exercise.”

The researchers were also able to discern that differences among local populations have an impact on the effectiveness of the different elements being tested. Generally, groups with lower immunization rates will respond more to incentives to immunize.

“In a way, we are landing back where we were in [the lentil study in] Rajasthan, where low immunization rates lead to super-high effects for these incentives,” says Duflo, who is also the Abdul Latif Jameel Professor of Poverty Alleviation and Development Economics. “We replicated the result in this context.” However, she reinforces, the new method allows scholars to acquire more information about that process more quickly.

An actionable path

The research team is hopeful that the new TVA method will gain wider adoption among scholars and lead to more experiments with multifaceted approaches, in which numerous potential solutions are evaluated simultaneously. The method could apply to antipoverty research, medical trials, and more.

Beyond that, they note, these kinds of results give governments and other organizations the ability to see how different policy options will play out, in both medical and fiscal terms.

“The reason why we did this was to be able to give the government of Haryana an actionable path, moving forward,” Duflo says.

She adds: “People before thought in order to say something with confidence, you should try just one treatment at a time,” meaning, one type of intervention at a time, such as incentives, or text messages. However, Duflo notes, “I’m very happy to say you can have more than one, and you can analyze all of them. It takes many steps, but such is life: many steps.”

In addition to Duflo and Banerjee, the co-authors of the study are Arun G. Chandrasekhar of J-PAL; Suresh Dalpath of the Government of Haryana; John Floretta of J-PAL; Matthew O. Jackson, an economist at Stanford University; Harini Kannan of J-PAL; Francine Loza of J-PAL; Anirudh Sankar of Stanford; Anna Schrimpf of J-PAL; and Maheshwor Shrestha of the World Bank.

The research was made possible through cooperation with the Haryana Department of Health and Family Welfare. 

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 19 May 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02312-2

Glaciers are retreating under climate change and generating excessive meltwater. A modelling study shows that regrowing glaciers may lead to water scarcity in the centuries after overshooting the +1.5 °C temperature target.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 19 May 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02318-w

How mountain glaciers will react to temporarily overshooting 1.5 °C of warming is poorly understood. Here the authors show irreversible global glacier loss for centuries after overshoot, implying long-term reductions in glacial water resources with amplified impacts in regions where glaciers regrow.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 19 May 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02337-7

Climate mitigation through natural climate solutions in crop-lands may be a way to reconcile climate goals with food security. However, here the authors show that some natural climate solution practices tend to lower yields and that maintaining yields lowers the potential GHG mitigation.

After multiple delays of the REAL ID Act of 2005 and its updated counterpart, the REAL ID Modernization Act, in the United States, the May 7th deadline of REAL ID enforcement has finally arrived. Does this move our security forward in the skies? The last 20 years says we got along fine without it. There were and are issues along the way that REAL ID does impose on everyday people, such as potential additional costs and rigid documentation, even if you already have a state issued ID. While TSA states this is not a national ID or a federal database, but a set of minimum standards required for federal use, we are still watchful of the mechanisms that have pivoted to potential privacy issues with the expansion of digital IDs.

But you don’t need a REAL ID just to fly domestically. There are alternatives.

The most common alternatives are passports or passport cards. You can use either instead of a REAL ID, which might save you an immediate trip to the DMV. And the additional money for a passport at least provides you the extra benefit of international travel.

Passports and passport cards are not the only alternatives to REAL ID. Additional documentation is also accepted as well: (this list is subject to change by the TSA):

• REAL ID-compliant driver's licenses or other state photo identity cards issued by Department of Motor Vehicles (or equivalent and this excludes a temporary driver’s license)
• State-issued Enhanced Driver's License (EDL) or Enhanced ID (EID)
• U.S. passport
• U.S. passport card
• DHS trusted traveler cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST)
• U.S. Department of Defense ID, including IDs issued to dependents
• Permanent resident card
• Border crossing card
• An acceptable photo ID issued by a federally recognized Tribal Nation/Indian Tribe, including Enhanced Tribal Cards (ETCs)
• HSPD-12 PIV card
• Foreign government-issued passport
• Canadian provincial driver's license or Indian and Northern Affairs Canada card
• Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
• U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Employment Authorization Card (I-766)
• U.S. Merchant Mariner Credential
• Veteran Health Identification Card (VHIC)

Foreign government-issued passports are on this list. However, using a foreign-government issued passport may increase your chances of closer scrutiny at the security gate. REAL ID and other federally accepted documents are supposed to be about verifying your identity, not about your citizenship status. Realistically, interactions with secondary screening and law enforcement are not out of the realm of possibility for non-citizens. The power dynamics of the border has now been brought to flying domestically thanks to REAL ID. The privileges of who can and can’t fly are more sensitive now.

REAL ID and other federally accepted documents are supposed to be about verifying your identity, not about your citizenship status

Mobile Driver’s Licenses (mDLs)

Many states have rolled out the option for a Mobile Driver's License, which acts as a form of your state-issued ID on your phone and is supposed to come with an exception for REAL ID compliance. This is something we asked for since mDLs appear to satisfy their fears of forgery and cloning. But the catch is that states had to apply for this waiver:

“The final rule, effective November 25, 2024, allows states to apply to TSA for a temporary waiver of certain REAL ID requirements written in the REAL ID regulations.”

TSA stated they would publish the list of states with this waiver. But we do not see it on the website where they stated it would be. This bureaucratic hurdle appears to have rendered this exception useless, which is disappointing considering the TSA pushed for mDLs to be used first in their context.

Google ID Pass

Another exception appears to bypass state issued waivers, Google Wallet’s “ID Pass”. If a state partnered with Google to issue mDLs, or if you have a passport, then that is acceptable to TSA. This is a large leap in terms of reach of the mDL ecosystem expanding past state scrutiny to partnering directly with a private company to bring acceptable forms of ID for TSA. There’s much to be said on our worries with digital ID and the rapid expansion of them outside of the airport context. This is another gateway that highlights how ID is being shaped and accepted in the digital sense.

Both with ID Pass and mDLs, the presentation flow allows for you to tap with your phone without unlocking it. Which is a bonus, but it is not clear if TSA has the tech to read these IDs at all airports nationwide and it is still encouraged to bring a physical ID for additional verification.

A lot of the privilege dynamics of flying appear through types of ID you can obtain, whether your shoes stay on, how long you wait in line, etc. This is mostly tied to how much you can spend on traveling and how much preliminary information you establish with TSA ahead of time. The end result is that less wealthy people are subjected to the most security mechanisms at the security gate. For now, you can technically still fly without a REAL ID, but that means being subject to additional screening to verify who you are.

REAL ID enforcement has some leg room for those who do not want or can’t get a REAL ID. But the progression of digital ID is something we are keeping watch of that continues to be presented as the solution to worries of fraud and forgery. Governments and private corporations alike are pushing major efforts for rapid digital ID deployments and more frequent presentation of one’s ID attributes. Your government ID is one of the narrowest, static verifications of who you are as a person. Making sure that information is not used to create a centralized system of information was as important yesterday with REAL ID as it is today with digital IDs.

Lawmakers and regulators around the world have been prolific with passing legislation restricting freedom of expression and privacy for LGBTQ+ individuals and fueling offline intolerance. Online platforms are also complicit in this pervasive ecosystem by censoring pro-LGBTQ+ speech, forcing LGBTQ+ individuals to self-censor or turn to VPNs to avoid being profiled, harassed, doxxed, or criminally prosecuted.  

The fight for the safety and rights of LGBTQ+ people is not just a fight for visibility online (and offline)—it’s a fight for survival. This International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, and Transphobia, we’re sharing four essential tips for LGBTQ+ people to stay safe online.

Using Secure Messaging Services For Every Communication 

All of us, at least occasionally, need to send a message that’s safe from prying eyes. This is especially true for people who face consequences should their gender or sexual identity be revealed without their consent.

To protect your communications from being seen by others, install an encrypted messenger app such as Signal (for iOS or Android). Turn on disappearing messages, and consider shortening the amount of time messages are kept in the app if you are actually attending an event. If you have a burner device with you, be sure to save the numbers for emergency contacts.

Don’t wait until something sensitive arises: make these apps your default for all communications. As a side benefit, the messages and images sent to family and friends in group chats will be safe from being viewed by automated and human scans on services like Telegram and Facebook Messenger. 

Consider The Content You Post On Social Media 

Our decision to send messages, take pictures, and interact with online content has a real offline impact. And whilst we cannot control every circumstance, we can think about how our social media behaviour impacts those closest to us and those in our proximity, especially if these people might need extra protection around their identities. 

Talk with your friends about the potentially sensitive data you reveal about each other online. Even if you don’t have a social media account, or if you untag yourself from posts, friends can still unintentionally identify you, report your location, and make their connections to you public. This works in the offline world too, such as sharing precautions with organizers and fellow protesters when going to a demonstration, and discussing ahead of time how you can safely document and post the event online without exposing those in attendance to harm.

If you are organizing online or conversing on potentially sensitive issues, choose platforms that limit the amount of information collected and tracking undertaken. We know this is not always possible as perhaps people cannot access different applications. In this scenario, think about how you can protect your community on the platform you currently engage on. For example, if you currently use Facebook for organizing, work with others to keep your groups as private and secure as possible.

Create Incident Response Plans

Developing a plan for if or when something bad happens is a good practice for anyone, but especially for LGBTQ+ people who face increased risk online. Since many threats are social in nature, such as doxxing or networked harassment, it’s important to strategize with your allies around what to do in the event of such things happening. Doing so before an incident occurs is much easier than when you’re presently facing a crisis.

Only you and your allies can decide what belongs on such a plan, but some strategies might be: 

• Isolating the impacted areas, such as shutting down social media accounts and turning off affected devices
• Notifying others who may be affected
• Switching communications to a predetermined more secure alternative
• Noting behaviors of suspected threats and documenting these 
• Outsourcing tasks to someone further from the affected circle who is already aware of this potential responsibility.

Consider Your Safety When Attending and Protests 

Given the increase in targeted harassment and vandalism towards LGBTQ+ people, it’s important to consider counterprotesters showing up at various events. Since the boundaries between events like pride parades and protest might be blurred, precautions are necessary. Our general guide for attending a protest covers the basics for protecting your smartphone and laptop, as well as providing guidance on how to communicate and share information responsibly. We also have a handy printable version available here.

This includes:

• Removing biometric device unlock like fingerprint or FaceID to prevent police officers from physically forcing you to unlock your device with your fingerprint or face. You can password-protect your phone instead.
• Logging out of accounts and uninstalling apps or disabling app notifications to avoid app activity in precarious legal contexts from being used against you, such as using queer dating apps in places where homosexuality is illegal. 
• Turning off location services on your devices to avoid your location history from being used to identify your device’s comings and goings. For further protections, you can disable GPS, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and phone signals when planning to attend a protest.

LGBTQ+ Rights For Every Day 

Consider your digital safety like you would any aspect of bodily autonomy and self determination—only you get to decide what aspects of yourself you share with others, how you present to the world, and what things you keep private. With a bit of care, you can maintain privacy, safety, and pride in doing so. 

And in the meantime, we’re fighting to ensure that the internet can be a safe (and fun!) place for all LGBTQ+ people. Now more than ever, it’s essential for allies, advocates, and marginalized communities to push back against these dangerous laws and ensure that the internet remains a space where all voices can be heard, free from discrimination and censorship.

From Hackaday.com, this is a neural network simulation of a pet squid.

Autonomous Behavior:

• The squid moves autonomously, making decisions based on his current state (hunger, sleepiness, etc.).
• Implements a vision cone for food detection, simulating realistic foraging behavior.
• Neural network can make decisions and form associations.
• Weights are analysed, tweaked and trained by Hebbian learning algorithm.
• Experiences from short-term and long-term memory can influence decision-making.
• Squid can create new neurons in response to his environment (Neurogenesis) ...